Editing Talk:Electroll reform

This concept is a good idea for consumerium, since voters are consumers. Note that voters are trolls when they formally refuse their ballots.

:Correct.  In 2000 in the U.S. many voters became trolls when they actually demanded that their ballots be counted!!!  In Florida, many were thrown away.

::And, in the US, UK, India and Canada, all voters who vote for minor parties are trolls, since they have no formal power in the system, which locks their [[faction]]s out of the legislature.  Europeans forget how they used to be trolls but now have election systems that make them citizens.

::But there are four different topics here, only two are fit for [[Consumerium]].  The two that belong are:

:::How [[edits, votes and bets]] combine as transactions in [[wiki management]] - and [[electroll reform]] as a way of demanding better methods, ''and maybe demanding even [[regime change]] (such as a new [[Lowest Troll]] who does not blank legitimate pages!''

:::How [[Wikimedia]] provides bad examples for [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] to learn from, and avoid.  That is, if we set things up right, there will not be so many people choosing to [[fork off]] or set up their own [[faction]] system (like [[Wikipedia Red Faction]]) out of the political structure the [[board]] sets up.  ''We probably understand this well enough now and don't need much more on this than is already here.  Really what should now happen is for [[Wikipedia]] people to read it and demand that "[[Wikimedia]]" resign.''

::The two that do not belong are:

:::How public-office-election trolls operate and what is their function and powers?  See [http://www.civicactions.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?USTrollAct this proposal] for an example of how trolls might become a duly deputized officer of their planet.

:::How [http://www.civicactions.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?InstructionalCapital instructional capital in the electoral process] affects the outcomes of it, and why or how trolls might change that.