Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Settings
About Consumerium development wiki
Disclaimers
Consumerium development wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Contributions
Log in
Editing
Talk:Best cases
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
Juxo: "some of these "best cases" are quite terrible imho)" :That's normal. And it's a good reason to have [[faction]]s, so that each can develop their own list of [[visions]] and [[best cases]]. Those things that tend to show up on one group's [[best cases]] and another group's [[worst cases]] are, obviously, the ones that will lead to a [[fork]] if not caught and negotiated in time. Usually [[Consumerium developers]] will want to proceed on the [[features]] that enable the widely shared [[best cases]] and which do not trigger anyone's [[worst cases]]. It's really the only way to figure out which way to steer in a [[nonprofit]] project relying on lots of volunteer effort. :Also, as with [[Consumerium Credit]], it's a separate proposal so that you can link it from any of the [[scenario analysis]] pages.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Consumerium development wiki are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 or later (see
Consumerium:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Return to "Best cases" page.