Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| Use of a [[jabber.org]] ID has been suggested as an '''interwiki identity standard''' or '''single login''' or '''sign-on''' for many [[large public wiki]]s, in particular for all [[GFDL corpus access provider]]s.
| | See [http://www.wikinfo.org/wiki.phtml?title=interwiki_identity_standard en:Wikinfo:interwiki identity standard] for a proposal for [[GetWiki]] recognition of one ID, preferably [[jabber.org]] ID, for all of [[GetWiki]] space. |
|
| |
|
| === making attribution claims easier ===
| | If [[GetWiki]] also monitors the whole [[GFDL text corpus]] at the [[standard wiki URI]]s, and the [[wikitext standard]] supports the [[RecentChanges]] and [[DeletedPages]] log's conventions, it would be easy to have some common address other than simple [[IP number]]s across many [[large public wiki]]s. |
|
| |
|
| Basically, the advantage is that [[attribution]] as required by [[GFDL]] and [[CC-by]] licenses becomes more or less automatic assuming the identity or sign-on is not [[cracked]]: people '''login''' once under a persistent [[pseudonym]] or perhaps their [[body name]] if they voluntarily disclose that, and thereafter, whatever is done from that [[login]] is properly attributed.
| | This would simplify [[identity dispute]]s for those who used such a voluntary common ID. For clashing allegations of identity, only a [[faction]] system can possibly work. ''See [http://www.wikinfo.org/wiki.phtml?title=Wikinfo:faction en:Wikinfo:faction] for a proposal for this that would suit pan-GFDL editing.'' |
| | |
| This has many advantages, few drawbacks, and tends to help overcome the problems with strict [[IP number]] based accountability and with [[identity dispute]]s arising from the many different [[user name space]]s. It should also solve the [[GFDL corpus]] problems with the [[attribution]] required by the [[GFDL]] itself and reduce the impact of [[Wikimedia corruption]] on the [[GFDL corpus]]. | |
| | |
| By reducing assumptions about [[alleged and collective identity]], i.e. the allegation or assumption that User:X on Wiki:X "is also" User:X on Wiki Y, it may reduce [[identity dispute]]s. For those who used such a voluntary common ID or '''single sign-on''' it would be slightly more difficult to impersonate them.
| |
| | |
| Ensuring all [[wiki user page]]s alleged to, or claimed to, belong to "the same person", and keeping these claims or allegations correctly attributed, is further simplified by reliance on a [[standard wiki URI]] for all such pages. ''Typically the [[Language:User:]] space is reserved for this on [[MediaWiki-based service]]s.''
| |
| | |
| === factions still required ===
| |
| | |
| However, for clashing allegations of identity, with deliberate deception, only a [[faction]] system can possibly work in the long run. ''See [http://www.wikinfo.org/wiki.phtml?title=Wikinfo:faction en:Wikinfo:faction] for a proposal for this that would suit pan-GFDL editing, and[http://ouranswer.org/wiki.phtml?title=faction en: OurAnswer:faction] for an experiment in this method.''
| |
| | |
| ''(insert example of the variety and complexity of problems arising from lack of such a standard, exploitation possibilities caused by identity confusion)''
| |
| | |
| Such a standard would not resolve other collective and alleged identity questions, where one is dealing not with self-alleged identity but with other-alleged identity. There is a fairly complex interaction between the question of factions and that of [[power structure]]s, including the role of [[sysop]]s and other such empowered users, and those they specifically disempower, called "[[trolls]]" and "[[vandals]]". Much of the complexity is re: trolling:
| |
| | |
| Avoiding the issue of an '''interwiki identity standard''' will almost certainly lead to various assertions that "X is a troll" where X is some inexactly defined cluster of concepts or styles or [[IP number]]s, leading to what are called [[echo chamber]] allegations floating all over, and even to other [[large public wiki]]s. Accordingly this is probably an important issue to address in [[GetWiki]], which ideally would support jabber.org logins.
| |
| | |
| === Wikinfo could have led, but won't ===
| |
| | |
| This is a huge problem on [[Wikipedia]] and somewhat on [[Wikinfo]], though this seems less likely, since [[sympathetic point of view]] requires fewer intra-article clashes. Of all [[GFDL corpus access provider]]s, Wikinfo may be the least likely to actually have this kind of problem. If [[GetWiki]] also monitors the whole [[GFDL text corpus]] at the [[standard wiki URI]]s, and the [[wikitext standard]] supports the [[RecentChanges]] and [[DeletedPages]] log's conventions, it would be easy to have some common address other than simple [[IP number]]s across many [[large public wiki]]s. However, a proposal for [[GetWiki]] recognition of one ID, preferably [[jabber.org]] ID, for all of [[GetWiki]] space, was censored by the particularly stupid [[GetWiki]] developers, who seem clearly only interested in their own commercial benefit.
| |