Editing Interference with commerce

Various forms of '''interference with commerce''' are considered [[civil liability]] or [[crime]] in some places, due to unwise decisions by certain politicians.  It is 100% certain that [[Consumerium Services]] will violate some of these laws in some places, as they are actually impossible to obey.

Examples include:
*"[[defaming food]]" which is used in particular in Texas to silence critics of its [[meat]] industry
*[[denial of service attack]]s which are classified as the bogus concept of "[[cyberterror]]" in some countries that passed stupid laws after 9/11
*various [[trademark]] claims made against people who are engaged in parodies or exposing [[brand]] name products

Providing information at [[point of purchase]] that discourages a purchase is certainly illegal in some places, but obviously this is what [[Consumerium buying signal]] itself really must do.  Accordingly, the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] needs a standard protocol of response to such claims by anyone that [[Consumerium]] itself facilitates '''interference with commerce'''.