Editing Integrity

'''Integrity''' is like [[trust]]:  if you have to talk about it, it isn't there.  So like [[distrust]], which is predictable lack of trust, e.g. [[checks and balances]], there is [[disintegrity]], consistent testing to find lack of  integrity.

[[Consumerium]] can expect to face at least the following challenges to its integrity:
*[[trolls]] who seem to be happy but might at any time bite us on the leg
*accusations of [[m:bias|bias]] and [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=systemic_bias systemic bias]
*plain [[m:liars |liars]] especially those who hide evidence of their lies
*[[m:Internet Authority Disease|Internet Authority Disease]] ([[misintegrity]])
**[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=little_tin_god_sysop  bad sysops] (those who cannot rise to [[m:troll|the good type of troll]])
**[[w:precedent|precedent]] - using one bad decision to justify the next one
**[[w:groupthink|groupthink]] - trying to agree with each other, sysop, leader
*[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=point_of_view POV problems] like silly [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Wikipedia_neutral_point_of_view Wikipedia neutral point of view]
*[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=propaganda propaganda] and well-meaning [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=propaganda_techniques propaganda techniques] that discredit us
*accusations that its use of [[electronics]] just leads to more [[e-waste]], that is, it is another [[geek]] site with only purpose being silly [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=virtual_community virtual community], that is, friends for geeks who deserve none, and doesn't do any real [[good]] or stop any real [[evil]]
*claims that the [[glossary]] is not a [[m:natural point of view|valid, natural, point of view]]

How it deals with these challenges will determine if it is trusted for anything else.  So far, [[trolls]] say, it does better than any other wikipedia3 site!