Editing Identifying people

Having identification data on someones person in the system without: 

A) Explicit consent from the person in question (recorded where?  how?  when?)
:Good questions. We must determine how to determine someone claiming to be someone is really that someone.

or 

B) The person being a [[publicly known person]] (eg. [[executive]]s ([[VP]], [[CEO]]...) that can be looked up by [[shareholder]]s or in the [[media]] or [[company register]]s, or [[shareholder]]s that can be looked up in [[stock exchange]] information systems or [[company register]]s or other people appearing in well known [[publication]]s ([[tv]], [[radio]], [[magazine]]s, [[news paper]]s or well established digital sources.)

is something I oppose up to the level of causing a [[w:fork|fork]], which would be very unfortunate should it come to that.  --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]]

:We all view some of someone else's behaviour as [[amoral purchasing]], i.e. "evil".  But we accept some [[political economy]] to limit those liabilities and tell us when something is "done".  You do not need to agree what is "good" but to some degree you must agree what is "[[safe]]", "[[done]]", and "[[evil]]" to agree what is "[[fair]]".  Because it is also good to [[ignore]] and [[forgive]].  So there must be a debate on all six of those words I think.  Those who agree on when all six must be used can agree on anything else and form a sort of [[faction]] that cooperates to coordinate the data.  Fair?

----
==See also:==

* [[Identifying companies]]