Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or
create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| Similar to [[neutral point of view]] (also [[single point of view]]) but without the claim of objectiveness or absolute truth. [[Factionally defined]] terms are allowed but only in the context of explaining that faction's view. | | Similar to [[neutral point of view]] (also [[single point of view]]) but without the claim of objectiveness or absolute truth. |
|
| |
|
| Such articles easily splinter into [[multiple point of view]], or are neutered.
| | See also: [[multiple point of view]]. |
| ''See [[non-neutral point of view]] for various perspectives on this neutering.''
| |
| | |
| The [[community point of view]] (with its attendant [[systemic bias]] and authorization of [[sysop vandalism]]) is itself a consensual point of view - where those who are "not part of the community" are held to count for nothing.
| |
| | |
| ''Examples:''
| |
| | |
| * C2 (WardsWiki)
| |
| * [[Disinfopedia]]
| |
| | |
| '''See also:'''
| |
| *[[POVs]] - for a complete listing of different POV schemes proposed or in use elsewhere
| |