Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Settings
About Consumerium development wiki
Disclaimers
Consumerium development wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Contributions
Log in
Editing
Audit
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
How can we '''audit''' Consumerium to make sure it is accurate and reliable? Who is the [[auditor]]? What is the [[audit process]]? When does it happen? How can we audit content from outside providers, or providers themselves? We may set up some democratic administration organisation to see that all is done with as little foul-play as we can arrange. ''See [[governance]] where [[Consumerium Council]] is outlined as possibility.'' We can't avoid bad things happening, by setting rules we can't enforce. So there must be an enforcement mechanism for daily routine, perhaps some auditing happens day by day using the trust in, or "[[social capital]] of" the board. In a very real way, the "good name" of Consumerium, the social capital it has with consumers themselves, is dependent on the trust they have in its board, council or governing mechanism. Given that mechanism or board or council, the audit is just a process they apply, often carried out over a short period of time when claims, evidence, and sources are investigated without mercy. A closely related issue is the [[inventory]] when everything is "counted", but how it got there is not considered. This is usually relevant only to the [[infrastructural capital]]. [[Content verification]] will always be problematic. ''Ideally'' the Consumerium team doesn't actually input any information on their own, but just provide the tools for others to put content up for consumers who trust in it and make decisions by it. This is about the integrity of [[instructional capital]]. Some reliability issues can only be solved by agreeing on ''rules that define what different participators can input'' but this still leaves the question of the '''audit''' itself, which validates that such rules were followed. Trust in individuals may well be the bottom line, but it can be the case that there is economic pressure people to exaggerate their own opinions. Imagine [[Company X]] employees put some accusations about [[Company Y]]. This can be questionable, especially if the two of them are [[direct competitor]]s, and the employees are being paid to do it on company time, or have stock options etc..
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Consumerium development wiki are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 or later (see
Consumerium:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)