Editing Administrator guidelines

Most [[large public wiki]] '''administrator guidelines''' simply reflect stupid [[sysopism]]:  an absolute trust in the [[command hierarchy]] of [[sysop]]s.  This has the effect of authorizing [[sysop vandalism]] and eradicating [[New Troll point of view]].

In other words, it is the same [[fascist]] version of [[politics as usual]] that has always prevented [[trollism]], better known as [[democracy]], from taking root.

Now that [[political party]] [[wiki management]] is more mature, it is easier to see what good guidelines that are more responsive to democracy look like.  This will help to set [[Publish:policy]].  Please consider:

From which [[Living Platform]] we quote:

"[[Politics as usual]] is a rough game. We do not have to play the same game. Increasingly, [[Wikipedia and]] other wiki based sources will play a role in political debate and discourse. We are preparing users for that. We will benefit from welcoming diversity and respecting each others views. The Green party has a goal of having a participation of 50%-50% male-female ratio. The masculine aspect being rough-skinned and the feminine aspect being thin-skinned, we will all benefit in the long run by learning to listen to each other and to dare express ourselves in a respectful and constructive way so we may co-create a world together. The debate need not be ruled by the extremists. And the extremists need not be ruled out. 

That said: 

Any [[ad hominem]] debate is destructive to Living Platform's goals. If someone's behavior is mentioned or debated it must be in the context of a more general principle. Accordingly if there is no link to some page that is a more general summary of the phenomena described, the comment can and should be removed without notice, and reverted."