Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or
create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 4: |
Line 4: |
|
| |
|
| What's clear is, the cheerleaders and the student council aren't the same folks, and shouldn't be selected by the same method. | | What's clear is, the cheerleaders and the student council aren't the same folks, and shouldn't be selected by the same method. |
|
| |
| :A [[social club]] (cheerleaders) and a [[faction]] (student council) are obviously different.
| |
|
| |
| --------------
| |
|
| |
| Also see [http://www.metaweb.com/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Metaweb:social_club Metaweb social club] which has a more elaborated discussion and analogies.
| |
|
| |
| ---------------
| |
|
| |
| Much of this is out of date, now that [http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Wikimedia Wikimedia] exists and its (corrupt, conflicted) board structure is clear. There is now no chance to get an [[independent board]] at Wikimedia, which simply shows how critical these early decisions on terminology and roles are.
| |
|
| |
| --------------
| |
|
| |
| Does listing [[interests of Consumerium contributors]] or [[Consumerium:contributor interests]] imply that a [[Consumerium Social Club]] ([[proper name]]) already exists? Or is this a way to figure out who's in what [[faction]]?
| |
|
| |
|
| -------------- | | -------------- |
|
| |
|
| [[Clay Shirky]] is now talking a lot about [[Nomic World]], a concept of his that users should be citizens of [[online service]]s (he even mentions [[large public wiki]]s as an example) and should control how they are run, and what is "property" within them. | | Also see [http://www.metaweb.com/wiki.phtml?title=Metaweb:social_club Metaweb social club] which has a more elaborated discussion of the division of powers. |