Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or
create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| and the inability to flash a [[green light]] or [[red light]]. | | and the inability to flash a [[green light]] or [[red light]]. |
|
| |
|
| It may also signal uncertainty when two green light products are available
| | Probably in this instance, the [[end user]] will want to review |
| at the same [[point of purchase]]. The only way to recommend one is to
| | the detailed comments about the product looked up by [[barcode]]. |
| know the [[price premium]] the [[consumer]] is willing to pay, which will
| | This will be note in [[Simple English]] about issues with, and |
| require translating the [[score]] into [[currency]], so that a device or
| |
| him/herself can calculate whether the price plus the premium they find to
| |
| reflect its merits, is more favourable to one product or the other. With
| |
| all this information in the [[database]], the yellow light could simply be
| |
| a price, meaning '''buy at this price'''. The acceptable product which comes closest to the buy price is the one that the consumer should buy.
| |
| | |
| Possibly in this instance, however, the [[end user]] will want to review
| |
| the detailed comments about the product looked up by [[barcode]]. There | |
| may be good reasons not to use the same criteria to evaluate both of the
| |
| products. Comments are a note in [[Simple English]] about issues with, and
| |
| merits of, the [[product]]. Probably filtered from [[opinion wiki]]. | | merits of, the [[product]]. Probably filtered from [[opinion wiki]]. |
|
| |
|