Talk:SINFOS: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 17:09, 11 December 2003

I'm trying to get info from SINFOS on what is their standpoint on non-profits (such as Consumerium. Other Players in the product registry business have already established and published their stand on different kinds connectivity to their master data (ie. ECCnet and EANnet Australia

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-I assume you have browsed through the PDF.
+I'm trying to get info from [[SINFOS]] on what is their standpoint on non-profits (such as [[Consumerium:Itself|Consumerium]]. Other Players in the [[Product registries|product registry]] business have already established and published their stand on different kinds connectivity to their master data (ie. [[ECCnet]] and [[EANnet Australia]]
-I assume it didn't take you long to panic slightly.
-[[Consumerium:Itself]] doesn't state that Consumerium in itself is a little greedy information-wise in other words it wants to keep a little bit of information to itself to be released in small doses to others at the right time. And the reason that [[Consumerium:Itself]] doesn't state this because it is obivious.
-Now how greedy is [[SINFOS]]? They wouldn't make the subscribers turn over their copyrights to the information would they? And if the manufacturer holds the copyright to their SINFOS standard format product information claim then...
-And yes. I'm in the process of inquiring the SINFOS folk about stuff about stufff. [[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 09:26, 10 Dec 2003 (EET)