Talk:Fair trade: Difference between revisions

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    (stupidity)
     
    No edit summary
    Line 1: Line 1:
    This reads like stupid garbage made up by an idiot.  You can't seriously tell us that these labels are used by anybody?!??
    "Fairly traded is a feature of a product.  
    "Fairly traded is a feature of a product.  
    Partially Fairly Traded is a feature of a product, meaning that some raw-materials or parts of the product are fairly traded. (eg. In restaurant meals)  
    Partially Fairly Traded is a feature of a product, meaning that some raw-materials or parts of the product are fairly traded. (eg. In restaurant meals)  
    Line 6: Line 4:
    Fully Fair Trading is a feature of a company, meaning that the company deals only in fairly traded goods."
    Fully Fair Trading is a feature of a company, meaning that the company deals only in fairly traded goods."


    :This reads like stupid garbage made up by an idiot.  You can't seriously tell us that these labels are used by anybody?!??  We can't make them up ourselves, as they are meaningless, and bad grammar besides.


    ---------
    ---------


    At least [[safe trade]] has a reasonable definition thanks to [[Greenpeace]].  If fair trade is defined so badly, perhaps we should just forget about it in our [[standard label]] scheme.
    At least [[safe trade]] has a reasonable definition thanks to [[Greenpeace]].  If fair trade is defined so badly, perhaps we should just forget about it in our [[standard label]] scheme.

    Revision as of 14:10, 2 May 2004

    "Fairly traded is a feature of a product. Partially Fairly Traded is a feature of a product, meaning that some raw-materials or parts of the product are fairly traded. (eg. In restaurant meals) Partially Fair Trading is a feature of a company, meaning that some part of the company's business deals with fairly traded products. Fully Fair Trading is a feature of a company, meaning that the company deals only in fairly traded goods."

    This reads like stupid garbage made up by an idiot. You can't seriously tell us that these labels are used by anybody?!?? We can't make them up ourselves, as they are meaningless, and bad grammar besides.

    At least safe trade has a reasonable definition thanks to Greenpeace. If fair trade is defined so badly, perhaps we should just forget about it in our standard label scheme.