Search results

  • [[Trolls]] advocate that [[faction]]s have ways to combine [[edits, votes and bets]] in such a way that only information that the factions can agree
    1 KB (244 words) - 01:37, 6 August 2004
  • 4 KB (675 words) - 17:11, 2 December 2003
  • ...objectively that an [[IP range block]] exists, or that an article is on [[Votes for deletion]], or even that its neutrality is disputed, without necessaril
    2 KB (254 words) - 13:41, 9 September 2004
  • ...f [[answer recommendation]] relying say on [[approval voting]] or [[edits, votes and bets]] in some other combination, that all factions accept as "objectiv
    2 KB (245 words) - 01:20, 6 August 2004
  • *integrating [[edits, votes and bets]] across many [[large public wiki]]s
    2 KB (270 words) - 07:46, 7 August 2004
  • ...possible only for these two individuals, Moeller and Starling, to rig the votes. ''See [[Disinfopedia]] entries on [http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml ...the SQL DB hides the order in which votes were cast, which is why to track votes one would need to monitor every transaction as it occurred.
    11 KB (1,936 words) - 13:40, 9 September 2004
  • ...that there is some [[factionally defined]] system of agreeing on [[edits, votes and bets]] they make ...noise" into [[Consumerium:intermediate page]]s that they sign and [[edits, votes and bets|somehow stake something on so we know they believe it]]. The nois
    5 KB (798 words) - 22:02, 21 March 2004
  • ...whether a possibly-unnecessary vote will go a certain way. Thus annoyance votes and annoyance edits can be heavily discouraged - and those who know what's ...th a known troll profile, that they are probably the same person with many votes or accounts.
    11 KB (1,748 words) - 16:51, 5 August 2004
  • [[Campaigns]] and [[TCE|Votes]] will accept input from [[web form]]s, and maybe [[comment]]s, but even th
    3 KB (396 words) - 18:48, 27 August 2005
  • ...- the /wiki/ subspace indicating articles amenable to wiki based [[edits, votes and bets|editing]]. There may be other spaces for /print/ or a non-wiki /e
    4 KB (630 words) - 15:12, 5 June 2005
  • [[Abe Sokolov]] listed it on votes for deletion, which is not supposed to apply to user pages, but no matter -
    2 KB (319 words) - 01:45, 12 May 2012
  • Here [[edits, votes and bets]] may be resolved and maybe disputed by formal [[faction]]s, by [[
    2 KB (320 words) - 15:58, 24 April 2012
  • ...here sysops tend to delete things with no process at all, and ignore the [[votes for deletion]] process that non-sysops are required to go through. ''This
    4 KB (722 words) - 15:54, 24 January 2005
  • ...on log]] to record what has been deleted, and a [[pending deletions]] or [[votes for deletion]] page to debate what may be deleted. This is true even on th
    3 KB (435 words) - 13:40, 12 April 2021
  • ...g ethicality and morality of human actions]] and kept it off [[w:Wikipedia:Votes for deletion]] for a looong time. '''Now the article has been deleted'''
    3 KB (571 words) - 09:08, 13 July 2012
  • ...e the templates used for quick voting will be under CC-A-SA but the actual votes are not under GFDL or CC-A-SA.. Right ? This can be done by loading a dump
    9 KB (1,308 words) - 12:28, 30 July 2020
  • ...action]]s advancing them. NOtice [[trolls]] did NOT say to NAME the page "Votes for deletion" which is a kangaroo court, just "proposed deletions" to slow
    9 KB (1,294 words) - 17:35, 24 July 2004
  • ...e of vote cast for a [[campaign]] in [[Opinion Wiki]]. Also other types of votes have been proposed see [[The Consumerium Exchange#Voting|The Consumerium Ex
    5 KB (762 words) - 10:41, 27 May 2022
  • ...ore we proceed to the [[future]] - see [[answer recommendation]], [[edits, votes and bets]] for some approaches.''
    8 KB (1,220 words) - 19:17, 23 April 2012
  • B) Managed to keep it from appearing in [[w:Wikipedia:Votes for deletion]] for 59 seconds without resorting to [[DDoS]]
    14 KB (2,414 words) - 03:36, 4 July 2003
View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)