Reviews: Difference between revisions

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    (undo vandalism. work on a reasonable introduction to the subject of review in Consumium)
    (some basic rules how to go about this "reviews" business wikiwise)
    Line 7: Line 7:
    * -- <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> to contribute a review, <nowiki>::~~~~</nowiki> added to the bottom of the list lists that you do not wish to write a review on this subject yourself and you signing the review which counts as
    * -- <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> to contribute a review, <nowiki>::~~~~</nowiki> added to the bottom of the list lists that you do not wish to write a review on this subject yourself and you signing the review which counts as


    If maker of a review wishes to remove the review s/he made s/he can do it and remove all seconding signatures as well   
    If maker of a review wishes to remove the review s/he made s/he can do it and remove all seconding signatures as well and the seconding signatures go to class <no review text given> and the signees are informed 
     
    Either <nowiki>[[Reviews:Business X]]</nowiki> or <nowiki>[[Business X/Reviews]]</nowiki> with highest <big>★</big>s up top and the lowest ( 1 <big>★</big> ) at the end of the article:
    ::within reverse chronological order inside the  <big>★★★★★</big>, <big>★★★★</big>, <big>★★★</big> ...

    Revision as of 12:44, 3 July 2012

    Reviews can be written by anyone. A short message is preferred over bloated text corpuses

    Reviews contain

    • stars of maximum ★★★★★ ( score )
    • text body
    • timedate
    • -- ~~~~ to contribute a review, ::~~~~ added to the bottom of the list lists that you do not wish to write a review on this subject yourself and you signing the review which counts as

    If maker of a review wishes to remove the review s/he made s/he can do it and remove all seconding signatures as well and the seconding signatures go to class <no review text given> and the signees are informed 

    Either [[Reviews:Business X]] or [[Business X/Reviews]] with highest s up top and the lowest ( 1 ) at the end of the article:

    within reverse chronological order inside the ★★★★★, ★★★★, ★★★ ...