False or unsubstantiated claims of corruption

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    Revision as of 15:42, 9 September 2004 by Jukeboksi (talk | contribs) (moved the "no independent board on wikimedia" basis of moving "not a sign of corruption" but pragmatism)

    False claim: Wikimedia holding Board Vote results is a sign of corruption

    False claim: Wikimedia is corrupt because it did not originally release full records of the Board Vote. Claim was stated as follows:


    The partially released results of the Wikimedia Board of Trustees "election" proves what trolls have always said: it is a front for the sysop power structure:

    Filed by 142.177.X.X date yet to be determined

    Motivation for critiqued practice

    This is not true. Imran and Danny have decided to not release full results apparently because some candidates wished they not be released. This has been critisized in the #wikipedia IRC channel recently and a plan is proposed that all results of those candidates who agree to releasing their votecounts would be released and those withholding would just look silly.
    Sorry, this was true when written, and, full disclosure is full disclosure. What were they trying to hide? Whether they succeeded in hiding it or not. It appears they were trying to hide just how many cronies could use their cronyism to score high in this "election"

    Resolution to claim being false

    After taking up the issue with Danny here are the full election results http://meta.wikipedia.org/wiki/Election_results --Juxo

    Claim not a sign of corruption: No independent board in Wikimedia

    • no independent board members not affiliated with operations or Bomis - the usual definition of an independent board is one that can judge operations objectively thus does not participate in them, operating as an avenue of appeal for any such decisions;

    Filed by 142.177.X.X date yet to be determined

    Motivation for critiqued practice

    One can not realistically that the first board of a new foundation would consist of any members who are not heavily involved and experienced in the area the board is supposed to be overseeing. Time for moving away from affiliated board members is when the foundation elects it's next board. Do not expect CGO to consist of any other then heavily involved people, this would be unrealistical and unproductive if the board members had no experience or involevement with the

    Resolution to not a sign of corruption

    Based on the motivation for having an initial board consisting of people affiliated with the real action the foundation is succesfully supporting.

    • Claim moved to FUCOC by and on --Juxo 18:42, 9 Sep 2004 (EEST)