Editing Talk:Employability
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:For this reason we need to aqcuire [[work description]]s and link them from [[product]]s | :For this reason we need to aqcuire [[work description]]s and link them from [[product]]s | ||
But the [[employability]]-meter could be useful within one [[country]] eg. a company based in [[Finland]] might employ X people in Finland and Y people in China. Now as in Finland it is fully possible to get [[cashflow]], [[asset]] and [[profit]] information that could be compared for each [[consumer]] according to her/his [[preferences]] on which countries to value for employment effect. | |||
::This is a very bad way to make a decision. It doesn't fit into the [[individual buying criteria]] of most [[Greens]], and for good reason. It creates only [[protectionism]] which is not the best way to get [[comprehensive outcome]]s of high [[moral value]]. To [[buy local]] doesn't mean to prefer something from across your own country to something from just across a border you live near. So countries aren't the way to do this. | ::This is a very bad way to make a decision. It doesn't fit into the [[individual buying criteria]] of most [[Greens]], and for good reason. It creates only [[protectionism]] which is not the best way to get [[comprehensive outcome]]s of high [[moral value]]. To [[buy local]] doesn't mean to prefer something from across your own country to something from just across a border you live near. So countries aren't the way to do this. |