Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or
create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| An '''accounting standard''' reflects assumptions about [[styles of capital]] and the [[capital depreciation]] of each (including [[goodwill]] which is kept high with [[brand management]] whether deserved or not), [[cashflow]], [[liability]] and other [[comprehensive outcome]]s that can cause liabilities.
| | #REDIRECT [[styles of capital]] |
| | |
| [[ISO 19011]] is the world standard for accounting now, but is not widely followed and doesn't deal with all issues. It is a first step towards real [[total cost of ownership]] and [[full cost accounting]].
| |
| | |
| However, it isn't quite real [[natural capital]] and [[ecological yield accounting, and doesn't document [[nature's services]] and [[state services]] the way it does for private enterprise to create a single [[service economy]] model. Doing that will be one of the most difficult [[Consumerium Challenges]].
| |
| | |
| [[Category:Accounting]]
| |