Editing Wiki vicious cycle

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 3: Line 3:
The vicious cycle is:
The vicious cycle is:


*[[contributor]]s are quietly going about their business when  
*contributors are quietly going about their business when  
*[[vandal]]s appear and sabotage their work, justifying the creation of  
*vandals appear and sabotage their work, justifying the creation of  
*[[sysop]]s who zealously track and IP ban vandals, held in check only by
*sysops who zealously track and IP ban vandals, and try to ignore
*[[trolls]] who consider them the 'enemy', doing everything possible to antagonize, distract, anger, and burn out sysops, hoping the very worst will be [[driven off by trolls]];  this is useful but in the process may cause actual  
*trolls who consider them the 'enemy', doing everything possible to antagonize, distract, anger, and burn out sysops, in the process causing actual  
contributors to leave, disgusted by all these various '''annoying users''' above.  
contributors to leave, disgusted by all these various annoying users above.  
*[[castle jumper]]s call for deletion of topics which are unfinished or seminal encylopedic works. United holyland en.wikipedia.com/wiki/e-consensus e-consensus etc..  These people are almost always advancing a [[faction]]al agenda and go unnoticed, degrading or steering the [[GFDL corpus]] their way.
*castle jumpers call for deletion of topics which are unfinished or seminal encylopedic works. United holyland en.wikipedia.com/wiki/e-consensus e-consensus etc..  


What makes this a '''vicious cycle''' is that, in the short term, each of the above has reasonable motivations and is making a reasonable decision. The vandal is just having 'fun' of some sort, and to his or her point of view, that's what [[Wikipedia]] is for: fun. The sysop is trying to put out fires, may consider himself or herself part of a en:Wikipedia:Volunteer fire department (see [[avoid the building metaphor]] and [[avoid extending metaphor]]), and doesn't care to distinguish vandals from trolls or (quite often) just those contributors whose political opinions he doesn't like. This drives away contributors who are mistaken for vandals, who are caught out in some 'rule' they don't understand, or who are just disgusted with lack of accountability of sysops. So this is already a vicious cycle - let's call it the [[Vandal-Sysop cycle]]. ''It may be a [[dialectic]] which forms the [[Sysop Vandal point of view]].  This is a relatively stable [[power struggle]].''
What makes this a vicious cycle is that, in the short term, each of the above has reasonable motivations and is making a reasonable decision. The vandal is just having 'fun' of some sort, and to his or her point of view, that's what Wikipedia is for: fun. The sysop is trying to put out fires, may consider himself or herself part of a en:Wikipedia:Volunteer fire department, and doesn't care to distinguish vandals from trolls or (quite often) just those contributors whose political opinions he doesn't like. This drives away contributors who are mistaken for vandals, who are caught out in some 'rule' they don't understand, or who are just disgusted with lack of accountability of sysops. So this is already a vicious cycle - let's call it the Vandal-Sysop cycle.  


Then, add in the troll who tries to somehow alter this power balance by going after specific sysops who she or he perceives as more oppressive or stupid or biased (call this the [[Sysop-Troll cycle]]), and you have recipes for more conflicts (the whole Vandal-Sysop-Troll '''Wikipedia vicious cycle''') that can't clearly be said to drive out more contributors, or fewer, than Vandal-Sysop alone. The trolls probably think they do good. The sysops probably think they do harm. Who cares what they think? It's what they do, that does the damage.  
Then, add in the troll who tries to somehow alter this power balance by going after specific sysops who she or he perceives as more oppressive or stupid or biased (call this the Sysop-Troll cycle), and you have recipes for more conflicts (the whole Vandal-Sysop-Troll Wikipedia vicious cycle) that can't clearly be said to drive out more contributors, or fewer, than Vandal-Sysop alone. The trolls probably think they do good. The sysops probably think they do harm. Who cares what they think? It's what they do, that does the damage.  


Perhaps a [Wikipedia] [[Peace Process]] is required to dampen the enthusiasm of sysops and trolls for attacking each other, so sysops can concentrate on dealing with actual vandals, and trolls can attack some less petty power clique which might (hint!) be a better use of their time.
Perhaps a [Wikipedia] [[Peace Process]] is required to dampen the enthusiasm of sysops and trolls for attacking each other, so sysops can concentrate on dealing with actual vandals, and trolls can attack some less petty power clique which might (hint!) be a better use of their time.
Please note that all contributions to Consumerium development wiki are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 or later (see Consumerium:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)
Retrieved from "https://develop.consumerium.org/wiki/Wiki_vicious_cycle"