Wiki management: Difference between revisions

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    (to avoid becoming like the dirty little criminals, one must study the dirty little criminals)
     
    No edit summary
    Line 11: Line 11:
    === problems ===
    === problems ===


    Specific '''wiki management''' problems include:
    Specific '''wiki management''' problems include, from longest to shortest term:
     
    ==== infrastructural ====
     
    *Picking [[wiki code]] that actually makes it easy to do the above, and avoiding that which has requirements set by a small clique of control freaks.
     
    *Balancing [[Consumerium:contributor]] vs. [[Consumerium:editor]] balances of power.  This may involve some mechanics, e.g. an explicit [[revert currency]].
     
    ==== social ====


    *Knowing when [[written consensus]] is possible, e.g. using [[troll bridge]] approach, and when it's just going to continue as [[edit war]] forever no matter what, i.e. it is a [[Consumerium:political dispute]] or something that reflects a real world POV difference.
    *Knowing when [[written consensus]] is possible, e.g. using [[troll bridge]] approach, and when it's just going to continue as [[edit war]] forever no matter what, i.e. it is a [[Consumerium:political dispute]] or something that reflects a real world POV difference.
    Line 17: Line 25:
    *Knowing when [[soft security]] can't apply, e.g. definition of [[Consumerium:vandalism]].
    *Knowing when [[soft security]] can't apply, e.g. definition of [[Consumerium:vandalism]].


    *Balancing [[Consumerium:contributor]] vs. [[Consumerium:editor]] balances of power.
    *Detecting and moderating [[usurper]] behaviour before they must be [[driven off by trolls]];  making sure that trolls do not unfairly charge the usurpers with things they have not actually done, or create their own [[echo chamber]].


    *Picking [[wiki code]] that actually makes it easy to do the above, and avoiding that which has requirements set by a small clique of control freaks.
    ==== instructional ====


    *Detecting and moderating [[usurper]] behaviour before they must be [[driven off by trolls]];  making sure that trolls do not unfairly charge the usurpers with things they have not actually done, or create their own [[echo chamber]].
    *[[Desysopping]] those who participate in creating or echoing [[spun death threat]]s, or granting these credibility or official status beyond what was actually saidthis sort of libel has extremely serious consequences in an age of no-fly lists.  If a comment is an actual threat of specific violence, it must be investigated.  If not, then claims that it is, must be put to rest, before the conflict over the comment escalates to the point of violence itself.


    *[[Desysopping]] those who participate in creating or echoing [[spun death threat]]s, or granting these credibility or official status beyond what was actually said;  this sort of libel has extremely serious consequences in an age of no-fly lists.  If a comment is an actual threat of specific violence, it must be investigated.  If not, then claims that it is, must be put to rest, before the conflict over the comment escalates to the point of violence itself.
    *[[protected page]] mechanics


    People will actually care about the material we manage here.  Jobs, companies, perhaps whole industries or national economies, will be at stake.  It's foolish to imagine that [[Consumerium]] will not have all the same problems, and worse, than have been seen in every other [[large public wiki]], and some they haven't yet seen.  If we are not prepared for the problems they ''have'' seen, it's not possible to be prepared for problems they haven't...
    People will actually care about the material we manage here.  Jobs, companies, perhaps whole industries or national economies, will be at stake.  It's foolish to imagine that [[Consumerium]] will not have all the same problems, and worse, than have been seen in every other [[large public wiki]], and some they haven't yet seen.  If we are not prepared for the problems they ''have'' seen, it's not possible to be prepared for problems they haven't...

    Revision as of 00:00, 16 February 2004

    Wiki management of the Content Wiki and Opinion Wiki, and the sysop power structure of each, is a major concern of Consumerium Governance. It must be supervised by the Consumerium Governance Organization under the guidance of a genuinely independent board.

    A poorly managed wiki, e.g. those run by Wikimedia, can generate legal and goodwill problems that spread far beyond their own services. For instance, a libel pit amplified by an echo chamber can generate an unlimited number of cease and desist letters from individuals who believe, probably correctly, they have been misrepresented or slandered by a bad copy problem or broken telephone picking up the output of the echo chamber.

    democratic user roles

    We may require formal Wiki Editor and Wiki Lawyer/advocate/mediator roles to guide Wiki Sysop behaviour. Left on their own they tend to be little tin gods - each hoping to grow up to be GodKing. This shouldn't be encouraged. Nor should a clique of usupers doing sysop vandalism, which seems to be the next step in the "evolution" away from GodKings to some priestly hierarchy.

    Consumerium buying signal will not stand up under scrutiny in a democratic society unless it has democratic sysop power structure. Good sysops are disposable, period. Good editors are not. And good lawyers can keep your project going when it otherwise would be flushed down the toilet (see reference to Wikimedia above, which will almost certainly be destroyed by failure to democratize in time).

    problems

    Specific wiki management problems include, from longest to shortest term:

    infrastructural

    • Picking wiki code that actually makes it easy to do the above, and avoiding that which has requirements set by a small clique of control freaks.

    social

    • Detecting and moderating usurper behaviour before they must be driven off by trolls; making sure that trolls do not unfairly charge the usurpers with things they have not actually done, or create their own echo chamber.

    instructional

    • Desysopping those who participate in creating or echoing spun death threats, or granting these credibility or official status beyond what was actually said; this sort of libel has extremely serious consequences in an age of no-fly lists. If a comment is an actual threat of specific violence, it must be investigated. If not, then claims that it is, must be put to rest, before the conflict over the comment escalates to the point of violence itself.

    People will actually care about the material we manage here. Jobs, companies, perhaps whole industries or national economies, will be at stake. It's foolish to imagine that Consumerium will not have all the same problems, and worse, than have been seen in every other large public wiki, and some they haven't yet seen. If we are not prepared for the problems they have seen, it's not possible to be prepared for problems they haven't...