Web of trust: Difference between revisions
(probably just another way to propagate Wikimedia corruption) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*[http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikipedia-l/2004-February/014300.html proposal for Wikimedia-wide web of trust] to reinforce [[sysop power structure]] | *[http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikipedia-l/2004-February/014300.html proposal for Wikimedia-wide web of trust] to reinforce [[sysop power structure]] | ||
This very bad idea [http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikipedia-l/2004-July/015929.html is advocated by] [[Daniel Mayer]], which is enough reason to reject it outright. Mayer believes in a strict hierarchical civilization based only on technology, where [[technological escalation]] is the source of trust and power, and so-called "[[trolls]]" may be hunted down | This very bad idea [http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikipedia-l/2004-July/015929.html is advocated by] [[Daniel Mayer]], which is enough reason to reject it outright. Mayer believes in a strict hierarchical civilization based only on technology, where [[technological escalation]] is the source of trust and power, and so-called "[[trolls]]" may be hunted down. ''Evidence for this is not hard to find - Mayer files [[false police report]]s against those whom he believes have offended him. Why anyone would want to reveal personal trust data to such person is beyond us.'' | ||
Latest revision as of 21:45, 18 July 2004
A web of trust is a public key infrastructure component that mirrors a social network: listing who trusts who to identify themselves and to verify when digital signature and/or email address has changed, or if a person is dead, disabled or removed from their position w.r.t. some role account.
There are various ways to think about using such a structure - one of the common but poorly advised ways to use it is to represent positive repute - an error made at advogato.org and perhaps also at Wikipedia quite soon:
This very bad idea is advocated by Daniel Mayer, which is enough reason to reject it outright. Mayer believes in a strict hierarchical civilization based only on technology, where technological escalation is the source of trust and power, and so-called "trolls" may be hunted down. Evidence for this is not hard to find - Mayer files false police reports against those whom he believes have offended him. Why anyone would want to reveal personal trust data to such person is beyond us.