User talk:Juxo/Chat Gallery/28.08.2004 with TimStarling: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:29, 29 August 2004

People who write code that uses the phrase log in right in the user interface and then refer to the same feature as "sign on" are just stupid. If they can't think clearly enough to use the same name for the same thing all the time, they can't think clearly enough to code it properly either.

"Single sign-on" is iirc the established CS term for this kind of functionality. That propably explains the lapse in naming. --Juxo 12:29, 29 Aug 2004 (EEST)

Revision as of 05:28, 29 August 2004 (edit) 142.177.114.88 (talk) (noting stupidity)		Revision as of 09:29, 29 August 2004 (edit) (undo) Jukeboksi (talk \| contribs) (Single sign-on is a established term for this kind of functionality) Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	People who write code that uses the phrase [[log in]] right in the [[user interface]] and then refer to the same feature as "sign on" are just stupid. If they can't think clearly enough to use the same name for the same thing all the time, they can't think clearly enough to code it properly either.		People who write code that uses the phrase [[log in]] right in the [[user interface]] and then refer to the same feature as "sign on" are just stupid. If they can't think clearly enough to use the same name for the same thing all the time, they can't think clearly enough to code it properly either.

			:"Single sign-on" is iirc the established CS term for this kind of functionality. That propably explains the lapse in naming. --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 12:29, 29 Aug 2004 (EEST)