User:Jukeboksi/Blog/July2005: Difference between revisions

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    (sorry for the inactivity. some thoughts on how to get to implementation)
     
    (I just upgraded this MediaWiki-installation to the latest version to keep us secure.)
    Line 6: Line 6:


    So to sum it up... To portray a different view point from some other can be done by lateral articles or sub-articleing the article in question. --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 17:29, 9 Jul 2005 (GMT)
    So to sum it up... To portray a different view point from some other can be done by lateral articles or sub-articleing the article in question. --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 17:29, 9 Jul 2005 (GMT)
    I just upgraded this [[MediaWiki]]-installation to the latest version to keep us secure.

    Revision as of 17:30, 9 July 2005

    Sorry that I've been so inactive this spring and begining of summer. I will try to focus more on what's really esssential: Getting to implementation phase. The plan in my head right now is that there will be only one wiki that will cover all the langauges, though in the starting phase only English will be allowed for practical reasons. Since Consumerium is not an encyclopedia multiple points of view can and should be simultanously expressed in many articles that "compete" with each other on popularity (votes).

    Certain Consumerium:reserved words will be allowed to be used only where they identify the type of article(s) the subarticle(s) are.

    Edit wars will not be as prominent as they are in NPOV wiki-projects by letting MPOV play out in parallel articles and subarticles that can be forced to be linked from the "main"-article by using m:User:Juxo/Extensions/ListSubPages-extension. In certain places sub-pages can be used to express support or opposition of the contents or naming of some article. For example, if someone writes an article named SomeProduct/reviews/Product is of low quality, which is a review (a reserved word) you can show support (a reserved word) by putting your signature on page SomeProduct/reviews/Product is of low quality/seconds (as in "second a motion") or opposition by starting an article SomeProduct/reviews/Product is good for use (a lateral article) or by creating SomeProduct/reviews/Product is of low quality/Above review does not portray reality (a sub-article)

    So to sum it up... To portray a different view point from some other can be done by lateral articles or sub-articleing the article in question. --Juxo 17:29, 9 Jul 2005 (GMT)

    I just upgraded this MediaWiki-installation to the latest version to keep us secure.