Talk:Urban ecology: Difference between revisions

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    No edit summary
     
    No edit summary
    Line 1: Line 1:
    'f course, anything thought irrelevant to this place, can just fly away to the english wikipedia (where people will either ignore it, or tear it into pieces :-))
    'f course, anything thought irrelevant to this place, can just fly away to the english wikipedia (where people will either ignore it, or tear it into pieces :-))
    :I think if the term is 'out there" and being used by others, it should be in the [[w:urban ecology]] article place, if only so that you can see who else is interested enough ithe concept to edit it, and who then to attract over here.
    :Usually the most interesting articles are attacked heavily.  See [[w:wealth]] and [[w:political economy]].  I put three interesting cut-outs in [[political economy]] here, and perhaps we need [[wealth]] and [[power]] stated here too alon with the other key concepts:
    *[[safe]], [[done]]
    *[[fair]], [[evil]]
    *[[ignore]], [[forgive]]
    *[[faction]], [[amoral purchasing]]
    I think you get all that right, you probably can make [[Consumerium]] work.

    Revision as of 09:08, 28 April 2003

    'f course, anything thought irrelevant to this place, can just fly away to the english wikipedia (where people will either ignore it, or tear it into pieces :-))

    I think if the term is 'out there" and being used by others, it should be in the w:urban ecology article place, if only so that you can see who else is interested enough ithe concept to edit it, and who then to attract over here.
    Usually the most interesting articles are attacked heavily. See w:wealth and w:political economy. I put three interesting cut-outs in political economy here, and perhaps we need wealth and power stated here too alon with the other key concepts:

    I think you get all that right, you probably can make Consumerium work.