Editing Talk:Urban ecology
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Usually the most interesting articles are attacked heavily. See [[w:wealth]] and [[w:political economy]]. I put three interesting cut-outs in [[political economy]] here, and perhaps we need [[wealth]] and [[power]] stated here too alon with the other key concepts: | :Usually the most interesting articles are attacked heavily. See [[w:wealth]] and [[w:political economy]]. I put three interesting cut-outs in [[political economy]] here, and perhaps we need [[wealth]] and [[power]] stated here too alon with the other key concepts: | ||
*[[safe]], [[done]] are probably [[individual]] ideas | *[[safe]], [[done]] are probably [[individual]] ideas | ||
*[[fair]], [[evil]] are probably [[instructional]] | *[[fair]], [[evil]] are probably [[instructional]] | ||
*[[ignore]], [[forgive]] are probably [[social]] | *[[ignore]], [[forgive]] are probably [[social]] | ||
*[[faction]], [[amoral purchasing]] are [[political]] whatever that means. | *[[faction]], [[amoral purchasing]] are [[political]] whatever that means. | ||
I think you get all that right, you probably can make [[Consumerium]] work. | I think you get all that right, you probably can make [[Consumerium]] work. | ||