Talk:Net domestic product: Difference between revisions

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    No edit summary
     
    (more evidence of corruption - sysop vandalism of key economic concepts - time for ending Wikimedia?)
     
    Line 2: Line 2:


    If you have already ensured that the article on [[w:gross domestic product]] has appropriate critique and links to [[w:net domestic product]], [[w:measuring well-being]], [[w:uneconomic growth]], and that related articles like [[w:economic growth]] have an up-front critique linked to [[w:uneconomic growth]], and that censorship of links to critics like [[w:Marilyn Waring]] has been undone, THEN you can delink this concept fairly from Wikimedia corruption.
    If you have already ensured that the article on [[w:gross domestic product]] has appropriate critique and links to [[w:net domestic product]], [[w:measuring well-being]], [[w:uneconomic growth]], and that related articles like [[w:economic growth]] have an up-front critique linked to [[w:uneconomic growth]], and that censorship of links to critics like [[w:Marilyn Waring]] has been undone, THEN you can delink this concept fairly from Wikimedia corruption.
    :An attempt today to do just this was met by the usual [[sysop vandalism]].  It thus is obviously still a problem, and begins to suggest that [[ending Wikimedia]] is the only rational course for those who care about these issues.


    Until you have done all that, the issue stands as evidence of their corruption and [[EPOV]].
    Until you have done all that, the issue stands as evidence of their corruption and [[EPOV]].

    Latest revision as of 20:49, 7 September 2004

    If trolls, doing their usual cleanup duties, have actually FIXED this problem, then feel free to delete links to Wikimedia corruption. That is:

    If you have already ensured that the article on w:gross domestic product has appropriate critique and links to w:net domestic product, w:measuring well-being, w:uneconomic growth, and that related articles like w:economic growth have an up-front critique linked to w:uneconomic growth, and that censorship of links to critics like w:Marilyn Waring has been undone, THEN you can delink this concept fairly from Wikimedia corruption.

    An attempt today to do just this was met by the usual sysop vandalism. It thus is obviously still a problem, and begins to suggest that ending Wikimedia is the only rational course for those who care about these issues.

    Until you have done all that, the issue stands as evidence of their corruption and EPOV.