Talk:MediaWiki modifications

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    Revision as of 13:41, 6 November 2003 by Jukeboksi (talk | contribs) (true, TikiWiki has some advantages and out-of-the-box features that we need)

    Given that the features you want are mostly in tikiwiki, why not just use that? It would be easier to support a common wikitext standard in that more supported software, than try to make mediawiki do what it doesn't do well.

    I'm looking into it. The new version 1.8 or Polaris seems much more responsive then the 1.4 and 1.5 i fooled around with when trying to locate a CMS to do this concept development & research stuff.
    • It does do valid XHTML which is an advantage over
    • The linkage visualization (map) thing seems very interesting
    • It does have group management already, but according to my knowledge adding this to MediaWiki isn't a problem at all.
    more on this debate MediWiki vs. Other Wiki Implementations later on. Maybe we should commit an article to this issue.Juxo

    MoinMoinWiki is even more extensible with a GREAT parser and extension system.