Talk:Heroic trolling: Difference between revisions

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    (why ending Wikimedia is necessary)
     
    (failure to comprehend: should such weak apprentices really be editing heroic trolling? Probably not)
     
    Line 7: Line 7:


    It stands nicely as an example of why [[ending Wikimedia]] is necessary.
    It stands nicely as an example of why [[ending Wikimedia]] is necessary.
    ---------
    Sadly the new apprentice trolls fail to comprehend the meaning of [[attribution]]:  to say something stupid, then watch it characterized and quoted as nonsense, then to try to attribute it to the opponent, is a bit transparent as a tactic.  But typical of the [[Sysop Vandal point of view]] which requires "correcting" true statements into false ones based on "who they believe wrote them" and other such [[ad hominem]] idiocy.

    Latest revision as of 00:23, 8 September 2004

    This trollog might be an example of heroic trolling:

    It stands nicely as an example of why ending Wikimedia is necessary.


    Sadly the new apprentice trolls fail to comprehend the meaning of attribution: to say something stupid, then watch it characterized and quoted as nonsense, then to try to attribute it to the opponent, is a bit transparent as a tactic. But typical of the Sysop Vandal point of view which requires "correcting" true statements into false ones based on "who they believe wrote them" and other such ad hominem idiocy.