Editing Talk:Guidelines for claiming corruption cases in Research Wiki

If human garbage that has actually made friends with [[Wikimedia]] will back off, these guidelines can be improved to being actually useful.  The case of [[alleged Wikimedia corruption]] and involvement of [[Bomis]] in subverting any attempt to create an [[independent board]] is an excellent [[Resarch Wiki pilot]] [[test case]], and when the [[Research Wiki]] exists, this case can be among the very first it deals with.  Advantages of that include:

*Expanding [[TIPAESA]] form to better model [[adversarial process]]es such as [[libel chill]] and [[perjury]] claims, which are going to be common in the actual operation of [[Consumerium Services]] (see [[Chief Editor]] especially)

*Creating maximum publicity for the [[Research Wiki]] - if the [[Wikipedia mailing list]] devotes say half of its bandwidth to lying about [[Consumerium]] (presently it is only about 10%), then, the wiser people who read that [[vile mailing list]] only to identify and attack [[Wikipedia]] will come over here, and the most experienced [[trolls]] will become participants in this project!

*Once and for all getting the truth about [[Wikimedia]] and its lies exposed;  dissecting an [[enemy project]] in full view of everyone who has criticized it or supported it - which is just what we will do to [[McDonald's]] or [[Coca-Cola]] or [[Exxon]] or [[Monsanto]], and which we must be ready to do without hesitation even to "friends".
Latest revision		Your text
Line 1:		Line 1:
	If human garbage that has actually made friends with [[Wikimedia]] will back off, these guidelines can be improved to being actually useful. The case of [[alleged Wikimedia corruption]] and involvement of [[Bomis]] in subverting any attempt to create an [[independent board]] is an excellent [[~~Consumerium Research~~ pilot]] [[test case]], and when the [[Research Wiki]] exists, this case can be among the very first it deals with. Advantages of that include:		If human garbage that has actually made friends with [[Wikimedia]] will back off, these guidelines can be improved to being actually useful. The case of [[alleged Wikimedia corruption]] and involvement of [[Bomis]] in subverting any attempt to create an [[independent board]] is an excellent [[Resarch Wiki pilot]] [[test case]], and when the [[Research Wiki]] exists, this case can be among the very first it deals with. Advantages of that include:

	*Expanding [[TIPAESA]] form to better model [[adversarial process]]es such as [[libel chill]] and [[perjury]] claims, which are going to be common in the actual operation of [[Consumerium Services]] (see [[Chief Editor]] especially)		*Expanding [[TIPAESA]] form to better model [[adversarial process]]es such as [[libel chill]] and [[perjury]] claims, which are going to be common in the actual operation of [[Consumerium Services]] (see [[Chief Editor]] especially)