Talk:Creative network: Difference between revisions

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    (permitting 'linguistic inferiors' to discuss creative or contact networks, but not social or power networks, is typical of the imperialist mind-set)
    (same thing again?)
    Line 1: Line 1:
    Note:  [[w:User:Angela]] deliberately deleted the article referenced as part of a vast [[ad hominem delete]] that has rendered the Simple English Wikipedia an [[enemy project]].  This [[sysop vandalism]] is a direct attack on the purposes of [[Consumerium]] which required good definitions that it did not have to write itself, but now has to... this is one of many reasons Angela was [[driven off by trolls]] today, and will be driven off again and again until she goes away permanently.  It is also the reason for the coming troll attacks at [[Simple English Wikipedia]] that will make it more or less useless for any purpose, and certainly an unpleasant project to work on, as all [[enemy projects]] soon will be.


    :Nonsense. The article is still there and was never deleted. [[User:Angela|Angela]] 06:46, 13 Jan 2004 (EET)
    ::So it is.  Apologies for the error.  It is very interesting that the ideas of a [[creative network]] and [[contact network]] prove politically correct for your purposes, and [[social network]] and [[power network]] do not.  While you look less like a vandal, you look more like a power grabber and imperialist all the time, "Angela".  Slowly, your agenda is revealed...
    ::Permitting 'linguistic inferiors' to discuss creative or contact networks, but not social or power networks, is typical of the imperialist mind-set

    Revision as of 23:28, 8 February 2004