Talk:Creative network: Difference between revisions

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    No edit summary
     
    No edit summary
     
    (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
    Line 1: Line 1:
    Note: [[w:User:Angela]] deliberately deleted the article referenced as part of a vast [[ad hominem delete]] that has rendered the Simple English Wikipedia an [[enemy project]].  This [[sysop vandalism]] is a direct attack on the purposes of [[Consumerium]] which required good definitions that it did not have to write itself, but now has to... this is one of many reasons Angela was [[driven off by trolls]] today, and will be driven off again and again until she goes away permanently.  It is also the reason for the coming troll attacks at [[Simple English Wikipedia]] that will make it more or less useless for any purpose, and certainly an unpleasant project to work on, as all [[enemy projects]] soon will be.
      It is very interesting that the ideas of a [[creative network]] and [[contact network]] prove politically correct for whatever purposes the [[usurper]][[User:Angela]] has in mind for [[Simple English Wikipedia]], while [[social network]] and [[power network]] do not. 
     
    Permitting 'linguistic inferiors' to discuss creative or contact networks, but not social or power networks, is typical of the imperialist mind-set best exemplified by [[User:Angela]].

    Latest revision as of 21:13, 10 February 2004

    It is very interesting that the ideas of a creative network and contact network prove politically correct for whatever purposes the usurperUser:Angela has in mind for Simple English Wikipedia, while social network and power network do not.  
    

    Permitting 'linguistic inferiors' to discuss creative or contact networks, but not social or power networks, is typical of the imperialist mind-set best exemplified by User:Angela.