Editing Talk:Consumerium governance
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:The point of a [[Consumerium Governance Organisation]] would be to become the "[[holder of copyright]]", although it would have heavy limits on what it can do, and would have procedures for forking off a new project even, just to keep that within the scope of control. One way to think of this is that [[faction]] opinions should be so well supported within Consumerium they don't need to go elsewhere, or start anything new. But if they are about to do so, it's better to know exactly when and how, and make sure they don't create competition say for access to the hardware in the stores, or license trouble for the data used. Like, part of agreeing to fork data or criteria for buying or notifying users must be NOT to try to interfere with or hack the ports original Consumerium uses on the devices. You want them at least to agree to go to a new port number!! | :The point of a [[Consumerium Governance Organisation]] would be to become the "[[holder of copyright]]", although it would have heavy limits on what it can do, and would have procedures for forking off a new project even, just to keep that within the scope of control. One way to think of this is that [[faction]] opinions should be so well supported within Consumerium they don't need to go elsewhere, or start anything new. But if they are about to do so, it's better to know exactly when and how, and make sure they don't create competition say for access to the hardware in the stores, or license trouble for the data used. Like, part of agreeing to fork data or criteria for buying or notifying users must be NOT to try to interfere with or hack the ports original Consumerium uses on the devices. You want them at least to agree to go to a new port number!! | ||