Talk:Consumerium Credit: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:10, 26 November 2003

Oh no no no. This is not a good idea even to throw in the air. We should focus on implementing the planned Features for the consumer and Consumerium Services for more active participants and leave this kind of stuff to the technology consultant groups who are all busy trying to invent something to keep them busy in the eyes of their customers.

That's why I put it on its own page. It's linked from visions and best cases now. Feel free to link it from worst cases and even threats with an explanation of how it could go wrong and discredit/disincentivize the whole system. Frankly I don't see any other way to actually know whether a user obeyed their own buying criteria, and the Ubiquitous case actually implies more privacy exposure by revealing whether someone bought something bad to everyone else.

Revision as of 21:56, 26 November 2003 (edit) Jukeboksi (talk \| contribs) m (bad idea)		Revision as of 22:10, 26 November 2003 (edit) (undo) 142.177.103.109 (talk) (yeah, there's issues, so link them from worst cases or threats even, that's why this is a separate scenario/proposal on its own page) Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Oh no no no. This is not a good idea even to throw in the air. We should focus on implementing the planned [[Features]] for the [[consumer]] and [[Consumerium Services]] for more active participants and leave this kind of stuff to the technology consultant groups who are all busy trying to invent something to keep them busy in the eyes of their customers		Oh no no no. This is not a good idea even to throw in the air. We should focus on implementing the planned [[Features]] for the [[consumer]] and [[Consumerium Services]] for more active participants and leave this kind of stuff to the technology consultant groups who are all busy trying to invent something to keep them busy in the eyes of their customers.

			:That's why I put it on its own page. It's linked from [[visions]] and [[best cases]] now. Feel free to link it from [[worst cases]] and even [[threats]] with an explanation of how it could go wrong and discredit/disincentivize the whole system. Frankly I don't see any other way to actually ''know'' whether a user obeyed their own [[buying criteria]], and the '''Ubiquitous''' case actually implies more [[privacy]] exposure by revealing whether someone bought something bad to everyone ''else''.