From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
Revision as of 13:33, 26 January 2005 by Jukeboksi (talk | contribs) (moved para that I'm going to dispute. You can't say whose vandalbot code it was unless you are in on the attack and are playing both sides to smear Tim and Wikimedia)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

There is no "speculation" here, a human cannot rename twenty pages to random strings and then blank them all in one minute, and that's exactly what was happening in the last week at Recyclopedia, over and over again. That was a vandalbot attack, and no one watching it could say any different.

I recall you previously claiming that the attacks lasted for several months and my personal experience as a user of Recyclopedia contrasts this claim that you made and now you have revised your story. How can I trust you on the above claim. --Juxo 14:33, 26 Jan 2005 (EET)

Moved from article by Juxo

The Anarchopedia's policy effort builds on prior efforts at Recyclopedia - an attempt to build a large public wiki without use of sysop powers at all. This failed however when many pages were renamed, censored, attacked, vandalized and moved by overt supporters of Wikimedia - this is not disputed - who had preferential access to vandalbot technology developed by Tim Starling, - this is not disputed - a notable advocate of technological escalation - likely to prevent the New Troll point of view from spreading. The Recyclopedia failed, and evidence of the above was largely removed from view.

I'll get back to disputing all of this when I get my email working and dig up Bobo's email address from somewhere.