Strange articles: Difference between revisions

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    No edit summary
    (position/argument)
    Line 1: Line 1:
    *[[Life exchange]] - this is really weird though it just might be that it's 142.177.X.X who wrote it is just thinking in a really radical way. It has some good points about [[dolphin-safe]] [[tuna]] vs. regular tuna. But the reason I'm moving the link here is because 142.177.X.X is using the word "profit" when talking about [[campaigns]], which doesn't make sense to me. Profit is something expressed in money or otherwise increases buying power and there is '''no money''' involved in campaigns, it's about opinions and facts to support those opinions.
    *[[Life exchange]] - this is really weird though it just might be that it's 142.177.X.X who wrote it is just thinking in a really radical way. It has some good points about [[dolphin-safe]] [[tuna]] vs. regular tuna. But the reason I'm moving the link here is because 142.177.X.X is using the word "profit" when talking about [[campaigns]], which doesn't make sense to me. Profit is something expressed in money or otherwise increases buying power and there is '''no money''' involved in campaigns, it's about opinions and facts to support those opinions.
    *: perhaps 142.177.x.x simply meant to use the word 'prophet'? (which could apply to campaigns)
    *: perhaps 142.177.x.x simply meant to use the word 'prophet'? (which could apply to campaigns)
    *:: or profit equated to power? (generalization?)


    * [[142.177.X.X]] has gone crazy (again) and wants a [[Consumerium Country]] or maybe s/he just is on the [[Troll]]ing tip again.
    * [[142.177.X.X]] has gone crazy (again) and wants a [[Consumerium Country]] or maybe s/he just is on the [[Troll]]ing tip again
    *: More like a Troll nation I bet.  


    *[[Best cases]] - an article by our local [[control freak]]
    *[[Best cases]] - an article by our local [[control freak]]

    Revision as of 03:41, 25 November 2003

    • Life exchange - this is really weird though it just might be that it's 142.177.X.X who wrote it is just thinking in a really radical way. It has some good points about dolphin-safe tuna vs. regular tuna. But the reason I'm moving the link here is because 142.177.X.X is using the word "profit" when talking about campaigns, which doesn't make sense to me. Profit is something expressed in money or otherwise increases buying power and there is no money involved in campaigns, it's about opinions and facts to support those opinions.
      perhaps 142.177.x.x simply meant to use the word 'prophet'? (which could apply to campaigns)
      or profit equated to power? (generalization?)