User contributions for 142.177.109.161

00:0200:02, 10 September 2004 diff hist +120‎ Trust ‎ references current

23:0223:02, 9 September 2004 diff hist +1,159‎ Libel by Wikimedia ‎ time to start looking for lawyers, these suits are inevitable, and CGO might as well profit from them current
22:5522:55, 9 September 2004 diff hist +35‎ Libel against Wikimedia ‎ many have done current
22:5322:53, 9 September 2004 diff hist +240‎ N Talk:Libel by Wikimedia ‎ asking opinions current
22:5222:52, 9 September 2004 diff hist +159‎ N Libel suit ‎No edit summary current
22:5122:51, 9 September 2004 diff hist +1,606‎ N Libel by Wikimedia ‎ more law
22:4222:42, 9 September 2004 diff hist +1,400‎ Libel against Wikimedia ‎ you want to talk law? here's the REAL law
22:3522:35, 9 September 2004 diff hist +343‎ Identity dispute ‎No edit summary
22:3322:33, 9 September 2004 diff hist +66‎ N Talk:Identity dispute ‎ why discuss the law or principles with people who have so few principles they cannot even spell the word properly? ("principal"? LOL) current
22:3222:32, 9 September 2004 diff hist +702‎ Identity dispute ‎ this "principal" (you moron) does not apply, immediate pursuit is about body relations in physical circumstances; besides which the assumptions made that way are still nothing but allegations
22:0022:00, 9 September 2004 diff hist +233‎ Authoritarianism ‎No edit summary current
21:5821:58, 9 September 2004 diff hist +41‎ N Alleged faction ‎ #REDIRECT Talk:Wikipedia (142 trolls); this is the only alleged faction or conspiracy we are presently discussing, though Wikimedia's sysop power structure may be another example current
21:5721:57, 9 September 2004 diff hist +666‎ Talk:Wikipedia (142 trolls) ‎No edit summary current
21:5421:54, 9 September 2004 diff hist +783‎ N Wikipedia (by Richard Chilton) ‎No edit summary current
21:5421:54, 9 September 2004 diff hist −739‎ Wikipedia (Richard Chilton) ‎ #REDIRECT Wikipedia (by Richard Chilton); this is an author who claims his own attribution, not a faction, so "by" applies current
21:5221:52, 9 September 2004 diff hist +3‎ Talk:Research:claim corruption ‎ ok it'll only be worse to do later, applying attribution standard ... (by Richard Chilton) current
21:5021:50, 9 September 2004 diff hist +553‎ N Talk:Research:claim corruption ‎No edit summary
21:4721:47, 9 September 2004 diff hist +150‎ N Research:claim corruption ‎ suggest standard: "claim corruption" is a verb phrase describing what a user might want to do in one click as a command verb, but claims of corruption is a noun phrase for the result current
21:4321:43, 9 September 2004 diff hist +61‎ Talk:Wikipedia (142 trolls) ‎ eg
21:4121:41, 9 September 2004 diff hist +216‎ N Talk:Wikipedia (142 trolls) ‎ naming convention suggested: Wikipedia (by 142 trolls)
21:3821:38, 9 September 2004 diff hist +501‎ Talk:Wikipedia ‎No edit summary
21:3521:35, 9 September 2004 diff hist +13,854‎ N Wikipedia (142 trolls) ‎ moved current
21:3521:35, 9 September 2004 diff hist −13,818‎ Wikipedia (from 142 perspective) ‎ "from" and "perspective" are redundant - moving to Wikipedia (142 trolls) to name article after commenting faction current
21:3221:32, 9 September 2004 diff hist +130‎ Wikipedia ‎No edit summary
21:2821:28, 9 September 2004 diff hist +1,050‎ N Central control ‎No edit summary current
21:2421:24, 9 September 2004 diff hist +607‎ N Authoritarianism ‎No edit summary
21:2121:21, 9 September 2004 diff hist +558‎ N User-owned, user-run, user-controlled ‎No edit summary current
21:1921:19, 9 September 2004 diff hist 0‎ Wikipedia (Richard Chilton) ‎No edit summary
21:1821:18, 9 September 2004 diff hist +783‎ N Wikipedia (Richard Chilton) ‎No edit summary
21:1021:10, 9 September 2004 diff hist +190‎ English Wikipedia User Richardchilton ‎ this excerpt could be titled Wikipedia (Richard Chilton) and is another perspective that should be integrated into Wikipedia (Reds) - the more Reds that explain the truth the better
20:3320:33, 9 September 2004 diff hist +64‎ Talk:Independent board ‎ avoid virtual community fanatics lusting to apply the police metaphor
20:3220:32, 9 September 2004 diff hist +1,886‎ Talk:Independent board ‎ candidates?
19:3819:38, 9 September 2004 diff hist −74‎ Wikinfo ‎ removing irrelevant nonsense - the Metaweb article on Wikinfo is entirely non-controversial and who wrote it is irrelevant - if anyone wants to know, they can look at its Page History there easily
19:3319:33, 9 September 2004 diff hist +535‎ User:Jukeboksi/Blog/September2004 ‎ are you actually tough enough to DO this job, Juxo? do you really think Monsanto or McDonald's or Exxon is going to be EASIER to deal with than Bomis/Wikimedia? tough it out and prove that you CAN
19:3019:30, 9 September 2004 diff hist +6‎ Research:claims of corruption ‎ #REDIRECT Guidelines for claiming corruption cases in Research Wiki woops odd name, too long to actually remember, thus probably a bad name current
19:3019:30, 9 September 2004 diff hist +65‎ N Research:claims of corruption ‎ #REDIRECT guidelines for claiming corruption in Research Wiki - rather than develop a whole "in" ...building metaphor, let's have a Research: space until en.consumerium.org exists
19:2919:29, 9 September 2004 diff hist −23‎ Guidelines for claims of corruption ‎ #REDIRECT Research:claims of corruption
19:2819:28, 9 September 2004 diff hist +66‎ N Guidelines for claims of corruption ‎ #REDIRECT guidelines for claims of corruption in Research Wiki; in general, such claims will be limited in Develop Wiki to those directly affecting operations or reliability of GFDL data
19:2719:27, 9 September 2004 diff hist +8‎ Talk:Guidelines for claiming corruption cases in Research Wiki ‎ fix link current
19:2519:25, 9 September 2004 diff hist +154‎ Test case ‎No edit summary current
19:2419:24, 9 September 2004 diff hist +1,753‎ N Test case ‎No edit summary
19:1719:17, 9 September 2004 diff hist +40‎ N Resarch Wiki pilot ‎ #REDIRECT Consumerium Research pilot current
19:1619:16, 9 September 2004 diff hist +1,424‎ N Talk:Guidelines for claiming corruption cases in Research Wiki ‎ usefulness
19:0919:09, 9 September 2004 diff hist +18‎ Wikimedia corruption ‎ #REDIRECT alleged Wikimedia corruption; that page is now balanced with clear marking of fact vs. allegation, transparent lying coverup "Response" from Wikimedia, and devastating "Counter", so current
19:0719:07, 9 September 2004 diff hist +543‎ Chief Editor ‎No edit summary
19:0119:01, 9 September 2004 diff hist +456‎ Independent board ‎No edit summary
18:5918:59, 9 September 2004 diff hist +2,042‎ Independent board ‎ definition from private sector, for use in resolving corruption claims and so on
18:5218:52, 9 September 2004 diff hist +3,670‎ Claims of corruption ‎ repairing vandalism damage: the source of the claims doesn't matter if they are easily documented, as they are (how to do so is now listed here), making "allegation" vs. "fact" more clear
18:3118:31, 9 September 2004 diff hist +4‎ Talk:Wikipedia (Reds) ‎ no delinking of Wikimedia corruption : it is the whole basis of the Reds' critique, you can't gut it like this in a talk page from Reds' perspective
18:2918:29, 9 September 2004 diff hist +18‎ N Consumerium:Reds ‎ #REDIRECT Reds; temporary redirect; when Consumerium:Reds are recognized formally as a faction of Consumerium:We, this can become a real article current
18:2918:29, 9 September 2004 diff hist +105‎ Wikipedia (from 142 perspective) ‎No edit summary
18:2818:28, 9 September 2004 diff hist +20‎ Talk:Wiki corruption ‎ revert vandalism; the point of a libel suit is to end Wikimedia corruption and its influence on the GFDL corpus; there is no point talking about corruption without that possibility current
18:2618:26, 9 September 2004 diff hist +4‎ Talk:Wikipedia (Reds) ‎ revert censorship; certainly from the POV of Wikipedia (Reds) there absolutely IS Wikimedia corruption, you are imposing YOUR POV on this legitimate faction - do so in Wikipedia (Blues) or whatev
18:2418:24, 9 September 2004 diff hist +152‎ Deleted ‎No edit summary
18:2318:23, 9 September 2004 diff hist +194‎ N Fred Bauder ‎No edit summary current
18:2218:22, 9 September 2004 diff hist +122‎ Wikinfo ‎ Bauder as Lowest Troll of Research Wiki? Worth considering
18:2018:20, 9 September 2004 diff hist +652‎ N Perjury ‎No edit summary current
18:1618:16, 9 September 2004 diff hist +2,387‎ N Chief Editor ‎ a key post
18:0918:09, 9 September 2004 diff hist +2,552‎ N Consumerium Governance Organization election ‎No edit summary current
17:5917:59, 9 September 2004 diff hist +785‎ User talk:Juxo ‎ time for real editorial policy
17:5517:55, 9 September 2004 diff hist +400‎ Talk:Wikipedia (Reds) ‎ is structural corruption now past the point of "fixing", or, can Wikipedia by fixed by kicking out Wales, Mayer, Starling, Moeller and Beesley?
17:5217:52, 9 September 2004 diff hist +46‎ N Unsubstantiated claims ‎ #REDIRECT false and unsubstantiated claims current
17:5117:51, 9 September 2004 diff hist +976‎ N Enemy project ‎No edit summary current
17:4717:47, 9 September 2004 diff hist +889‎ Wikipedia ‎No edit summary
17:4317:43, 9 September 2004 diff hist +407‎ Class action suit ‎ revert attempt to trivialize: the GFDL contributors do not "feel" they are deprived, they can PROVE this, and there are MANY cases of alleged and collective identity and libel re: WM current
17:4217:42, 9 September 2004 diff hist +641‎ Wikipedia (Reds) ‎ fate of Wikimedia in Reds' view, Richardchilton's perspective
17:3917:39, 9 September 2004 diff hist +9,030‎ Wikipedia (Reds) ‎ fixing cut off intro, adding introduction from Reds perspective
17:3517:35, 9 September 2004 diff hist +5,121‎ N Wikipedia (Reds) ‎ moved
17:3517:35, 9 September 2004 diff hist −13,719‎ Wikipedia (from 142 perspective) ‎ #REDIRECT Wikipedia (Reds) - this is a factional view shared by many commentators, all of whom are invited to contribute to it
17:3317:33, 9 September 2004 diff hist +574‎ What Consumerium is not ‎ revert vandalism; real people don't accept "rules" from garbage/sysops who devote their lives to libelling and censoring others - get lost
17:3117:31, 9 September 2004 diff hist +26‎ False and unsubstantiated claims ‎No edit summary
17:3017:30, 9 September 2004 diff hist +2,155‎ N False and unsubstantiated claims ‎No edit summary
17:2317:23, 9 September 2004 diff hist +2,155‎ N Class action suit ‎ grounds for such suits, which now seem inevitable
17:1517:15, 9 September 2004 diff hist +2,536‎ N Talk:Wiki corruption ‎ the Wikimedia corruption is spreading HERE: some suggestions on how to stop it: 1. redirect w: to WIkinfo, 2. invite entire Wikipedia Red Faction into CGO, and so on
17:0517:05, 9 September 2004 diff hist +18‎ Wikimedia corruption ‎ revert; If you want discussion of Wikipedia to tail off, redirect w: to Wikinfo - until then, this is a main issue and main topic of discussion
17:0317:03, 9 September 2004 diff hist +886‎ User:Jukeboksi/Blog/September2004 ‎ poor judgement
16:5816:58, 9 September 2004 diff hist +1,686‎ Guidelines for claiming corruption cases in Research Wiki ‎ why these "guidelines" are worthless: constant sysop vandalism of any attempt to document the claims or any background material that supports arguments that this is bad for GFDL corpus current
16:5116:51, 9 September 2004 diff hist +7,318‎ N Talk:Wikipedia (Reds) ‎ (talk about) what Reds think of Wikipedia
16:5016:50, 9 September 2004 diff hist −7,283‎ Talk:Wikipedia (from 142 perspective) ‎ whole Red Faction seems to share this perspective, there is no "142 perspective", that's just an IP range current
16:4816:48, 9 September 2004 diff hist +324‎ Deleted ‎ sorry sysop
16:4716:47, 9 September 2004 diff hist +454‎ N Talk:False or unsubstantiated claims of corruption ‎No edit summary
16:4216:42, 9 September 2004 diff hist +756‎ User:Jukeboksi/Blog/September2004 ‎ game over

10 September 2004

9 September 2004