Simple Trollish: Difference between revisions

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    No edit summary
    (troll equivalent terms to eradicate philosophy as usual)
    Line 1: Line 1:
    Some people have trouble understanding [[trollish]].  The [[Meta-Wikipedia]]'s  [[m:List_of_articles_all_languages_should_have|list of articles all languages should have]] includes the following required to understand "philosophy":
    Some people have trouble understanding [[trollish]].  The [[Meta-Wikipedia]]'s  [[m:List_of_articles_all_languages_should_have|list of articles all languages should have]] includes the following required to understand "philosophy":
    *[[scientific method]]  
    *[[scientific method]] - ''which trolls improve to [[scienterrific myehod]]''
    *[[knowledge]]  
    *[[knowledge]] - ''which trolls [[gnaw]] down into [[some body]] [[gnawlij]]''
    *[[truth]]  
    *[[truth]] - ''which trolls define by [[deference]] to the [[world tree]]''
    *[[neutral point of view]]  
    *[[neutral point of view]] - ''see [[New Troll point of view]]''
    *[[ethics]]  
    *[[ethics]] - ''see [[moral order]]''
    *[[politics]]  
    *[[politics]] - ''see [[politics as usual]]''
    *[[ontology]]
    *[[ontology]] - ''see [[some body]] versus [[no body]]''
    *[[consensus decision making]]  
    *[[consensus decision making]] - ''see [[gnawing]]''
    *[[trolling]]
    *[[trolling]] - ''see [[heroic trolling]] and [[magnificent trolling]]''


    Accordingly, a '''Simple Trollish''' encyclopedia must explain all of these too.  [[Consumerium]] defines the above from a [[New Troll point of view]] - a much more accurate way to view these things than a "philosophy" could ever be.
    Accordingly, a '''Simple Trollish''' encyclopedia must explain all of these and their trollish equivalents.  [[Consumerium]] defines the above from a [[New Troll point of view]] - a much more accurate way to view these things than a "philosophy" could ever be.


    ''ok, you are right, [[trolling]] was not listed, but really philosophy is just a form of trolling, so it should be there!''
    ''ok, you are right, [[trolling]] was not listed, but really philosophy is just a form of trolling, so it should be there!''

    Revision as of 06:58, 10 August 2004

    Some people have trouble understanding trollish. The Meta-Wikipedia's list of articles all languages should have includes the following required to understand "philosophy":

    Accordingly, a Simple Trollish encyclopedia must explain all of these and their trollish equivalents. Consumerium defines the above from a New Troll point of view - a much more accurate way to view these things than a "philosophy" could ever be.

    ok, you are right, trolling was not listed, but really philosophy is just a form of trolling, so it should be there!