Simple Trollish: Difference between revisions

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    (troll equivalent terms to eradicate philosophy as usual)
    No edit summary
     
    (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
    Line 1: Line 1:
    Some people have trouble understanding [[trollish]].  The [[Meta-Wikipedia]]'s  [[m:List_of_articles_all_languages_should_have|list of articles all languages should have]] includes the following required to understand "philosophy":
    Some people have trouble understanding [[trollish]].  The [[Meta-Wikipedia]]'s  [[m:List_of_articles_all_languages_should_have|list of articles all languages should have]] includes the following required to understand "philosophy":
    *[[scientific method]] - ''which trolls improve to [[scienterrific myehod]]''
    *[[scientific method]] - ''which trolls improve to [[scienterrific myehod]]''
    *[[knowledge]] - ''which trolls [[gnaw]] down into [[some body]] [[gnawlij]]''
    *[[knowledge]] - ''which trolls [[gnaw]] down into [[gnawlij]] of [[some body]]''
    *[[truth]] - ''which trolls define by [[deference]] to the [[world tree]]''
    *[[truth]] - ''which trolls [[defer]] to the [[world tree]]''
    *[[neutral point of view]] - ''see [[New Troll point of view]]''
    *[[neutral point of view]] - ''see [[New Troll point of view]]''
    *[[ethics]] - ''see [[moral order]]''
    *[[ethics]] - ''see [[moral order]]''
    Line 12: Line 12:
    Accordingly, a '''Simple Trollish''' encyclopedia must explain all of these and their trollish equivalents.  [[Consumerium]] defines the above from a [[New Troll point of view]] - a much more accurate way to view these things than a "philosophy" could ever be.
    Accordingly, a '''Simple Trollish''' encyclopedia must explain all of these and their trollish equivalents.  [[Consumerium]] defines the above from a [[New Troll point of view]] - a much more accurate way to view these things than a "philosophy" could ever be.


    ''ok, you are right, [[trolling]] was not listed, but really philosophy is just a form of trolling, so it should be there!''
    ''ok, you are right, [[trolling]] was not listed, but [[philosophy as usual]] is just a form of trolling really, so it should be there!''

    Latest revision as of 07:02, 10 August 2004

    Some people have trouble understanding trollish. The Meta-Wikipedia's list of articles all languages should have includes the following required to understand "philosophy":

    Accordingly, a Simple Trollish encyclopedia must explain all of these and their trollish equivalents. Consumerium defines the above from a New Troll point of view - a much more accurate way to view these things than a "philosophy" could ever be.

    ok, you are right, trolling was not listed, but philosophy as usual is just a form of trolling really, so it should be there!