Patent pool: Difference between revisions

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    No edit summary
     
    No edit summary
    Line 3: Line 3:
    Major issues with such pooling are:
    Major issues with such pooling are:
    *[[globalization]] has not made patent law the same globally, yet, so there are country-specific concerns, especially
    *[[globalization]] has not made patent law the same globally, yet, so there are country-specific concerns, especially
    *[[mandatory patent licensing]] and how one may or may not discriminate among users or types of use under the laws of different countries
    *[[mandatory patent license]]s and how one may or may not discriminate among users or types of use under the laws of different countries
    *[[required reintegration]] of [[improvement]]s, which have a very specific legal definition in patent law and again may be different in each country
    *[[required reintegration]] of [[improvement]]s, which have a very specific legal definition in patent law and again may be different in each country
    *[[consortium license]] interaction with the above, and any [[patent]] or other [[instructional capital]] held or developed or shared within contributor corps
    *[[consortium license]] interaction with the above, and any [[patent]] or other [[instructional capital]] held or developed or shared within contributor corps

    Revision as of 23:24, 24 November 2003

    A patent pool is a legal trust that owns patents. It must have some governance organization to actually make decisions about administering these. MIT and the Government of China run the largest known patent pools. A much smaller pool is the open patent pool which are licensed to "everybody".

    Major issues with such pooling are:

    Whether to have such a pool or requirements in Consumerium License is up to the Consumerium Governance Organization, like other license constraints.