Moral cognition: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A better name for [[w:Formal method for evaluating and quantifying ethicality and morality of human actions]], although that name is kind of funky and fun. | A better name for [[w:Formal method for evaluating and quantifying ethicality and morality of human actions]], although that name is kind of funky and fun. | ||
:So much so that [[sysop vandalism]] was triggered. They are such garbage. The article was fine and was there for years. | :So much so that [[sysop vandalism]] was triggered. They are such garbage. The article was fine and was there for years. Perhaps if it is [[undelete]]d along with everything else lost to [[ad hominem delete]], there could be some basis for discussion. But probably not, as the [[Sysop Vandal point of view]] is that there is no such formal method, only [[groupthink]] and their own bias treated as [[God's Eye View]]. They must reject any more principled methods! | ||
Latest revision as of 17:24, 3 September 2004
A better name for w:Formal method for evaluating and quantifying ethicality and morality of human actions, although that name is kind of funky and fun.
- So much so that sysop vandalism was triggered. They are such garbage. The article was fine and was there for years. Perhaps if it is undeleted along with everything else lost to ad hominem delete, there could be some basis for discussion. But probably not, as the Sysop Vandal point of view is that there is no such formal method, only groupthink and their own bias treated as God's Eye View. They must reject any more principled methods!