How Consumerium differs from Wikipedia in a nutshell: Difference between revisions

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    No edit summary
     
    m (adjust some punctuation in the non-attributed paragraph; I'll avoid editing the attributed/signed paragraph though it's tempting)
     
    Line 1: Line 1:
    In a nutshell [[Consumerium:Itself|Consumerium]] differs from [[Wikipedia]] in a fundamental way in that wikipedia is necessarily a [[consensus]] aimed project due to it's stated goal of being an [[w:encyclopedia|encyclopedia]] which quite directly imposes the necessity to always claim [[NPOV]] in contrast with consumerium, which is a consensus and [[dissensus]] project simultaneously.  
    In a nutshell [[Consumerium:Itself|Consumerium]] differs from [[Wikipedia]] in a fundamental way in that wikipedia is necessarily a [[consensus]] aimed project due to its stated goal of being an [[w:encyclopedia|encyclopedia]], which quite directly imposes the necessity to always claim [[NPOV]]; in contrast with consumerium, which is a consensus and [[dissensus]] project simultaneously.  


    This fundamental difference that exists because of the different natures of these projects undermines the '''"always avoid the Wikipedia ways"'''-argumentation that has nearly deflated to the level of [[trollism|one-party]] rethoric. --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] [[Lowest Troll]] of [[Consumerium]]
    This fundamental difference that exists because of the different natures of these projects undermines the '''"always avoid the Wikipedia ways"'''-argumentation that has nearly deflated to the level of [[trollism|one-party]] rethoric. --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] [[Lowest Troll]] of [[Consumerium]]

    Latest revision as of 22:18, 19 August 2005

    In a nutshell Consumerium differs from Wikipedia in a fundamental way in that wikipedia is necessarily a consensus aimed project due to its stated goal of being an encyclopedia, which quite directly imposes the necessity to always claim NPOV; in contrast with consumerium, which is a consensus and dissensus project simultaneously.

    This fundamental difference that exists because of the different natures of these projects undermines the "always avoid the Wikipedia ways"-argumentation that has nearly deflated to the level of one-party rethoric. --Juxo Lowest Troll of Consumerium