Editing Due process

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 3: Line 3:
When no due process exists, there is usually said to be no justice, no democracy, and no rights.  These things are all thought in Western philosophy to proceed directly from due process.
When no due process exists, there is usually said to be no justice, no democracy, and no rights.  These things are all thought in Western philosophy to proceed directly from due process.


Usually, due process includes and is served by an [[adversarial process]] where parties present their cases in a neutral form and stick to the facts.  ''See [[142.X.X.X/Tim_Starling]] for one such adversarial presentation, which speaks to the need for [[faction]] structure and strict control over the [[developer]]s whose power can overrule even the [[sysop power structure]] and corrupt [[wiki management]] such as that which has already ruined [[Wikimedia]].''
Usually, due process includes and is served by an [[adversarial process]] where parties present their cases in a neutral form and stick to the facts.  ''See [[142.X.X.X/Tim_Starling]] for one such adversarial presentation, which speaks to the need for [[faction]] structure and strict control over the [[developer]]s whose power can overrule even the [[sysop power structure]] and corrupt [[wiki management]].''


The [[Content Wiki]] will have more need for such a process than [[Opinion Wiki]], since its content directly alters the [[consumerium buying signal]].  However, even for opinions, there is a need for a significantly higher degree of due process than is applied in most [[large public wiki]]s.  Failure to put it in place leads to [[usurper]] activity, [[framer]] tactics, and eventually [[cease and desist letter]]s that there is no clear [[paper trail]] to answer.
The [[Content Wiki]] will have more need for such a process than [[Opinion Wiki]], since its content directly alters the [[consumerium buying signal]].  However, even for opinions, there is a need for a significantly higher degree of due process than is applied in most [[large public wiki]]s.  Failure to put it in place leads to [[usurper]] activity, [[framer]] tactics, and eventually [[cease and desist letter]]s that there is no clear [[paper trail]] to answer.


All of this will collapse [[Consumerium Services]] in a hurry, so a clearly-documented accountable trail that shows how things alter the buying signal is critical.  Probably it will not be complete and rigorous until there is a fully [[Transparent Consumerium]].
All of this will collapse [[Consumerium Services]] in a hurry, so a clearly-documented accountable trail that shows how things alter the buying signal is critical.  Probably it will not be complete and rigorous until there is a fully [[Transparent Consumerium]].
Please note that all contributions to Consumerium development wiki are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 or later (see Consumerium:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)