Bureaucrats, developer, Administrators
9,838
edits
Ape mother: Difference between revisions
+ Category:Advocacy
No edit summary |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
An '''ape mother''' is a mother that gives birth to apes. | |||
''Whether one sees humans as apes is seemingly quite political. See the [[ape mother (troll version)]] for a view not very sympathetic to the poor hairy mommas doing their best to deal with uncaring humans who shoot at 'em or just don't care and ignore them to play technology or status games. | |||
Those who actually care about nurturing females of similar species see it this way, instead:'' | |||
------------- | |||
One way to evaluate the [[w:goodness|moral goodness]] of '''ape mother''' behaviour objectively is by weaning times, and perserverance against the civilization, or lack thereof. Mothers who have lots of support from fellow apes and who wean their children quickly to be rid of them and get back into the workplace, can be seen as poorer mothers than those that have less or no support, and who protect their children until a much more advanced age. | One way to evaluate the [[w:goodness|moral goodness]] of '''ape mother''' behaviour objectively is by weaning times, and perserverance against the civilization, or lack thereof. Mothers who have lots of support from fellow apes and who wean their children quickly to be rid of them and get back into the workplace, can be seen as poorer mothers than those that have less or no support, and who protect their children until a much more advanced age. | ||
| Line 6: | Line 14: | ||
To head off the more violent default solutions to this type of problem, one way [[Consumerium]] can help is to establish [[well-being]] of '''ape mother'''s in general as a criteria for the [[Consumerium buying signal]]. This seems to be one of several [[moral cognition]] factors that could be reasonably "objective", despite the "subjective" hate brutalizers and torturers of such mothers evoke. Surely we can agree about the badness of the oppression even if we cannot agree about the goodness of ways to deal with the oppression? | To head off the more violent default solutions to this type of problem, one way [[Consumerium]] can help is to establish [[well-being]] of '''ape mother'''s in general as a criteria for the [[Consumerium buying signal]]. This seems to be one of several [[moral cognition]] factors that could be reasonably "objective", despite the "subjective" hate brutalizers and torturers of such mothers evoke. Surely we can agree about the badness of the oppression even if we cannot agree about the goodness of ways to deal with the oppression? | ||
[[Kala]] � ''Tarzan of the Apes' '' foster mum is an example of an Ape mother in fiction. She's the one that impresses upon the trickster changling that citizenship is good and important. | |||
[[Category:Advocacy]] | |||