Bureaucrats, developer, Administrators
9,838
edits
Anarcopedia: Difference between revisions
not all Anarchopedia users seem to have undelete rights currently. An interesting theory, but not fully applied and apparently not applicable in practice without a hint of sysopitivity
(rm speculation about claimed bot attacks on recyclopedia. We've been through this before, remember?) |
(not all Anarchopedia users seem to have undelete rights currently. An interesting theory, but not fully applied and apparently not applicable in practice without a hint of sysopitivity) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''Anarchopedia''' [http://anarchopedia.org .org] is the first [[large public wiki]] to attempt to eliminate all [[sysop vandalism]]. | The '''Anarchopedia''' [http://anarchopedia.org .org] is the first [[large public wiki]] to attempt to eliminate all [[sysop vandalism]]. In the start a policy that any [http://meta.anarchopedia.org/index.php/Special:Listusers registered user] can [[undelete page]]s was declared, which in theory makes [[ad hominem delete]] no worse a problem than [[ad hominem revert]]. Currently the policy does not seem to be fully applied, which is understandable as it gives [[vandal]]s full powers to wreck stuff. | ||
Without this special power to prevent their opponents from reading the alternative view, it is thought, [[sysop power structure]] will not form at all. | |||
'''Anarchopedia''' seems not only to embrace but seek to extend the [[NTPOV]] to all aspects of [[wiki governance]] and [[wiki management]]. There are no [[vile mailing list]]s and no [[cabal]] of friends with [[infrastructure owners trust]] as there is at [[Wikipedia]]. | '''Anarchopedia''' seems not only to embrace but seek to extend the [[NTPOV]] to all aspects of [[wiki governance]] and [[wiki management]]. There are no [[vile mailing list]]s and no [[cabal]] of friends with [[infrastructure owners trust]] as there is at [[Wikipedia]]. | ||
It is also notable for embracing a [[one wiki model]]. It has some problems addressing [[language vs. area]] specializations. | It is also notable for embracing a [[one wiki model]]. It has some problems addressing [[language vs. area]] specializations. | ||