Anarcopedia: Difference between revisions

330 bytes removed ,  25 January 2005
rm speculation about claimed bot attacks on recyclopedia. We've been through this before, remember?
No edit summary
 
(rm speculation about claimed bot attacks on recyclopedia. We've been through this before, remember?)
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Anarchopedia''' [http://anarchopedia.org .org] is the first [[large public wiki]] to attempt to eliminate all [[sysop vandalism]].  It does this largely by letting any user [[undelete page]]s, making [[ad hominem delete]] no worse a problem than [[ad hominem revert]].  Without this special power to prevent their opponents from reading the alternative view, it is thought, [[sysop power structure]] will not form at all.
The '''Anarchopedia''' [http://anarchopedia.org .org] is the first [[large public wiki]] to attempt to eliminate all [[sysop vandalism]].  It does this largely by letting any user [[undelete page]]s, making [[ad hominem delete]] no worse a problem than [[ad hominem revert]].  Without this special power to prevent their opponents from reading the alternative view, it is thought, [[sysop power structure]] will not form at all.


This builds on prior efforts at [[Recyclopedia]] that were censored/attacked/vandalized by supporters of [[Wikimedia]] who had preferential access to [[vandalbot]] technology developed by [[Tim Starling]], a notable advocate of [[technological escalation]] to prevent the [[New Troll point of view]] from spreading.
'''Anarchopedia''' seems not only to embrace but seek to extend the [[NTPOV]] to all aspects of [[wiki governance]] and [[wiki management]].  There are no [[vile mailing list]]s and no [[cabal]] of friends with [[infrastructure owners trust]] as there is at [[Wikipedia]].
 
By contrast, '''Anarchopedia''' seems not only to embrace but seek to extend the [[NTPOV]] to all aspects of [[wiki governance]] and [[wiki management]].  There are no [[vile mailing list]]s and no [[cabal]] of friends with [[infrastructure owners trust]] as there is at [[Wikipedia]].


It is also notable for embracing a [[one wiki model]].  It has some problems addressing [[language vs. area]] specializations.
It is also notable for embracing a [[one wiki model]].  It has some problems addressing [[language vs. area]] specializations.
9,838

edits