User contributions for 142.177.109.161
9 September 2004
- 19:3819:38, 9 September 2004 diff hist −74 Wikinfo removing irrelevant nonsense - the Metaweb article on Wikinfo is entirely non-controversial and who wrote it is irrelevant - if anyone wants to know, they can look at its Page History there easily
- 19:3319:33, 9 September 2004 diff hist +535 User:Jukeboksi/Blog/September2004 are you actually tough enough to DO this job, Juxo? do you really think Monsanto or McDonald's or Exxon is going to be EASIER to deal with than Bomis/Wikimedia? tough it out and prove that you CAN
- 19:3019:30, 9 September 2004 diff hist +6 Research:claims of corruption #REDIRECT Guidelines for claiming corruption cases in Research Wiki woops odd name, too long to actually remember, thus probably a bad name current
- 19:3019:30, 9 September 2004 diff hist +65 N Research:claims of corruption #REDIRECT guidelines for claiming corruption in Research Wiki - rather than develop a whole "in" ...building metaphor, let's have a Research: space until en.consumerium.org exists
- 19:2919:29, 9 September 2004 diff hist −23 Guidelines for claims of corruption #REDIRECT Research:claims of corruption
- 19:2819:28, 9 September 2004 diff hist +66 N Guidelines for claims of corruption #REDIRECT guidelines for claims of corruption in Research Wiki; in general, such claims will be limited in Develop Wiki to those directly affecting operations or reliability of GFDL data
- 19:2719:27, 9 September 2004 diff hist +8 Talk:Guidelines for claiming corruption cases in Research Wiki fix link current
- 19:2519:25, 9 September 2004 diff hist +154 Test case No edit summary current
- 19:2419:24, 9 September 2004 diff hist +1,753 N Test case No edit summary
- 19:1719:17, 9 September 2004 diff hist +40 N Resarch Wiki pilot #REDIRECT Consumerium Research pilot current
- 19:1619:16, 9 September 2004 diff hist +1,424 N Talk:Guidelines for claiming corruption cases in Research Wiki usefulness
- 19:0919:09, 9 September 2004 diff hist +18 Wikimedia corruption #REDIRECT alleged Wikimedia corruption; that page is now balanced with clear marking of fact vs. allegation, transparent lying coverup "Response" from Wikimedia, and devastating "Counter", so current
- 19:0719:07, 9 September 2004 diff hist +543 Chief Editor No edit summary
- 19:0119:01, 9 September 2004 diff hist +456 Independent board No edit summary
- 18:5918:59, 9 September 2004 diff hist +2,042 Independent board definition from private sector, for use in resolving corruption claims and so on
- 18:5218:52, 9 September 2004 diff hist +3,670 Claims of corruption repairing vandalism damage: the source of the claims doesn't matter if they are easily documented, as they are (how to do so is now listed here), making "allegation" vs. "fact" more clear
- 18:3118:31, 9 September 2004 diff hist +4 Talk:Wikipedia (Reds) no delinking of Wikimedia corruption : it is the whole basis of the Reds' critique, you can't gut it like this in a talk page from Reds' perspective
- 18:2918:29, 9 September 2004 diff hist +18 N Consumerium:Reds #REDIRECT Reds; temporary redirect; when Consumerium:Reds are recognized formally as a faction of Consumerium:We, this can become a real article current
- 18:2918:29, 9 September 2004 diff hist +105 Wikipedia (from 142 perspective) No edit summary
- 18:2818:28, 9 September 2004 diff hist +20 Talk:Wiki corruption revert vandalism; the point of a libel suit is to end Wikimedia corruption and its influence on the GFDL corpus; there is no point talking about corruption without that possibility current
- 18:2618:26, 9 September 2004 diff hist +4 Talk:Wikipedia (Reds) revert censorship; certainly from the POV of Wikipedia (Reds) there absolutely IS Wikimedia corruption, you are imposing YOUR POV on this legitimate faction - do so in Wikipedia (Blues) or whatev
- 18:2418:24, 9 September 2004 diff hist +152 Deleted No edit summary
- 18:2318:23, 9 September 2004 diff hist +194 N Fred Bauder No edit summary current
- 18:2218:22, 9 September 2004 diff hist +122 Wikinfo Bauder as Lowest Troll of Research Wiki? Worth considering
- 18:2018:20, 9 September 2004 diff hist +652 N Perjury No edit summary current
- 18:1618:16, 9 September 2004 diff hist +2,387 N Chief Editor a key post
- 18:0918:09, 9 September 2004 diff hist +2,552 N Consumerium Governance Organization election No edit summary current
- 17:5917:59, 9 September 2004 diff hist +785 User talk:Juxo time for real editorial policy
- 17:5517:55, 9 September 2004 diff hist +400 Talk:Wikipedia (Reds) is structural corruption now past the point of "fixing", or, can Wikipedia by fixed by kicking out Wales, Mayer, Starling, Moeller and Beesley?
- 17:5217:52, 9 September 2004 diff hist +46 N Unsubstantiated claims #REDIRECT false and unsubstantiated claims current
- 17:5117:51, 9 September 2004 diff hist +976 N Enemy project No edit summary current
- 17:4717:47, 9 September 2004 diff hist +889 Wikipedia No edit summary
- 17:4317:43, 9 September 2004 diff hist +407 Class action suit revert attempt to trivialize: the GFDL contributors do not "feel" they are deprived, they can PROVE this, and there are MANY cases of alleged and collective identity and libel re: WM current
- 17:4217:42, 9 September 2004 diff hist +641 Wikipedia (Reds) fate of Wikimedia in Reds' view, Richardchilton's perspective
- 17:3917:39, 9 September 2004 diff hist +9,030 Wikipedia (Reds) fixing cut off intro, adding introduction from Reds perspective
- 17:3517:35, 9 September 2004 diff hist +5,121 N Wikipedia (Reds) moved
- 17:3517:35, 9 September 2004 diff hist −13,719 Wikipedia (from 142 perspective) #REDIRECT Wikipedia (Reds) - this is a factional view shared by many commentators, all of whom are invited to contribute to it
- 17:3317:33, 9 September 2004 diff hist +574 What Consumerium is not revert vandalism; real people don't accept "rules" from garbage/sysops who devote their lives to libelling and censoring others - get lost
- 17:3117:31, 9 September 2004 diff hist +26 False and unsubstantiated claims No edit summary
- 17:3017:30, 9 September 2004 diff hist +2,155 N False and unsubstantiated claims No edit summary
- 17:2317:23, 9 September 2004 diff hist +2,155 N Class action suit grounds for such suits, which now seem inevitable
- 17:1517:15, 9 September 2004 diff hist +2,536 N Talk:Wiki corruption the Wikimedia corruption is spreading HERE: some suggestions on how to stop it: 1. redirect w: to WIkinfo, 2. invite entire Wikipedia Red Faction into CGO, and so on
- 17:0517:05, 9 September 2004 diff hist +18 Wikimedia corruption revert; If you want discussion of Wikipedia to tail off, redirect w: to Wikinfo - until then, this is a main issue and main topic of discussion
- 17:0317:03, 9 September 2004 diff hist +886 User:Jukeboksi/Blog/September2004 poor judgement
- 16:5816:58, 9 September 2004 diff hist +1,686 Guidelines for claiming corruption cases in Research Wiki why these "guidelines" are worthless: constant sysop vandalism of any attempt to document the claims or any background material that supports arguments that this is bad for GFDL corpus current
- 16:5116:51, 9 September 2004 diff hist +7,318 N Talk:Wikipedia (Reds) (talk about) what Reds think of Wikipedia
- 16:5016:50, 9 September 2004 diff hist −7,283 Talk:Wikipedia (from 142 perspective) whole Red Faction seems to share this perspective, there is no "142 perspective", that's just an IP range current
- 16:4816:48, 9 September 2004 diff hist +324 Deleted sorry sysop
- 16:4716:47, 9 September 2004 diff hist +454 N Talk:False or unsubstantiated claims of corruption No edit summary
- 16:4216:42, 9 September 2004 diff hist +756 User:Jukeboksi/Blog/September2004 game over