Bureaucrats, developer, Administrators
9,850
edits
(someone has deleted w:Formal method for evaluating and quantifying ethicality and morality of human actions) |
(142.177.X.X has a wiki, Lsb or http://let.sysops.be with evolving ontologies and fresh stuff) |
||
(28 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown) | |||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
142.177.X.X is a [[w:robot]]; it examines wiki history for controversy and pastes text into related articles. <br> | 142.177.X.X is a [[w:robot]]; it examines wiki history for controversy and pastes text into related articles. <br> | ||
142.177.X.X is a [[w:cult]]; it has beliefs, priests, rituals. <br> | 142.177.X.X is a [[w:cult]]; it has beliefs, priests, rituals. <br> | ||
142.177.X.X has a wiki, [[Lsb]] or http://let.sysops.be/wiki/ with evolving ontologies and fresh material around the year :D | |||
142.177.X.X is most famous for the amazing feat of succeding to write [[w:Formal method for evaluating and quantifying ethicality and morality of human actions]] and kept it off [[w:Wikipedia:Votes for deletion]] for a looong time. '''Now the article has been deleted''' | 142.177.X.X is most famous for the amazing feat of succeding to write [[w:Formal method for evaluating and quantifying ethicality and morality of human actions]] and kept it off [[w:Wikipedia:Votes for deletion]] for a looong time. '''Now the article has been deleted''' | ||
::That was obviously [[ad hominem delete]], i.e. [[sysop vandalism]]. The title was only the title you chose, because, you chose it. Certainly it was a worthy article and should be retained under a title like [[formal methods for ethical valuation]] which means the same thing. If an article stands for years and is only deleted when [[Tim Starling]] notices it referenced here, well... | |||
:Thank you. But the credit belongs only to my souped-up Commodore 64. It is a very wise machine. | :Thank you. But the credit belongs only to my souped-up Commodore 64. It is a very wise machine. | ||
::Nonsense. Machines cannot be wise, only intelligent. | |||
:But perhaps that article is simply *correct* and can thus be used to design the consumerium version of the method? | :But perhaps that article is simply *correct* and can thus be used to design the consumerium version of the method? | ||
Line 23: | Line 28: | ||
:::Trolls agree. Cross linking is critical, so pick phrases carefully in titles. It is impossible to fix this later, if the phrases are wrong. | :::Trolls agree. Cross linking is critical, so pick phrases carefully in titles. It is impossible to fix this later, if the phrases are wrong. | ||
Legendary quote of 142.177.X.Xs' from [[Propaganda]]: | |||
"Propaganda is not what we do here." | |||
---- | |||
142.177.X.X often accuses other people of doing things or not doing things that he then proceeds to do or not do, respectively. For an example see http://develop.consumerium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:False_and_unsubstantiated_claims&curid=2818&diff=5266&oldid=5259 (about the complaint about the way that 142.177.X.X merged of Anthere's replies to his allegations with the allegations) and http://develop.consumerium.org/wiki/index.php?title=False_or_unsubstantiated_claims_of_corruption&curid=2782&diff=5261&oldid=5260 (where he makes edits not mentioned in the summary and removes someone else's (mine) edits while adding his own elsewhere in the article) --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 18:52, 14 Sep 2004 (EEST) |