Voting - Revision history

Jukeboksi: + Category:Voting

2021-04-12T14:26:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:26, 12 April 2021
Line 90:		Line 90:

	[[Category:Help]]		[[Category:Help]]
			[[Category:Voting]]

Jukeboksi: levering -> middling

2019-05-11T12:18:44Z

levering -> middling

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:18, 11 May 2019
Line 12:		Line 12:
	<tr><td bgcolor="Black"><font color=#009900>'''+1'''</font></td><td bgcolor="White"> Supports [[Company X]] </td></tr>		<tr><td bgcolor="Black"><font color=#009900>'''+1'''</font></td><td bgcolor="White"> Supports [[Company X]] </td></tr>
	<tr><td bgcolor="Black"><font color=#009900>'''+1'''</font></td><td bgcolor="White">Tries to support [[Company X]] </td></tr>		<tr><td bgcolor="Black"><font color=#009900>'''+1'''</font></td><td bgcolor="White">Tries to support [[Company X]] </td></tr>
	<tr><td bgcolor="Black"><font color=yellow>'''0'''</font></td><td bgcolor="White">~~is neutral about or~~</td>		<tr><td bgcolor="Black"><font color=yellow>'''0'''</font></td><td bgcolor="White">Votes middle</td>
	<td bgcolor="Black"><font color=yellow>'''00 (+1 and -1)'''</font></td><td bgcolor="White">~~Levers [must find better word] or~~</td>		<td bgcolor="Black"><font color=yellow>'''00 (+1 and -1)'''</font></td><td bgcolor="White">middles</td>
	<td bgcolor="Black"><font color=yellow>'''0000 (+2 and -2)'''</font></td><td bgcolor="White">~~Levers~~ heavily</td></tr>		<td bgcolor="Black"><font color=yellow>'''0000 (+2 and -2)'''</font></td><td bgcolor="White">middles heavily</td></tr>
	<tr><td bgcolor="Black"><font color=#CC0000>'''-1'''</font></td><td bgcolor="White">Tries to avoid [[Company X]] </td></tr>		<tr><td bgcolor="Black"><font color=#CC0000>'''-1'''</font></td><td bgcolor="White">Tries to avoid [[Company X]] </td></tr>
	<tr><td bgcolor="Black"><font color=#CC0000>'''-1 '''</font></td<td bgcolor="White">Avoids [[Company X]]</td></tr>		<tr><td bgcolor="Black"><font color=#CC0000>'''-1 '''</font></td<td bgcolor="White">Avoids [[Company X]]</td></tr>
Line 21:		Line 21:


	<table><tr><td>'''All 0's move~~/lever~~ the result towards'''</td><td bgcolor="Black"><font color="yellow">50% positive.</font></td></tr></table>		<table><tr><td>'''All 0's move the result towards'''</td><td bgcolor="Black"><font color="yellow">50% positive.</font></td></tr></table>

Jukeboksi: /* Right to vanish for the voters */ fixing

2014-01-08T15:38:51Z

Right to vanish for the voters: fixing

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:38, 8 January 2014
Line 27:		Line 27:

	== Right to vanish for the voters ==		== Right to vanish for the voters ==
	By default voter ids and wiki-accounts ~~can~~ cannot be connected for reasons of consumer privacy protection.		By default voter ids and wiki-accounts cannot be connected for reasons of consumer privacy protection.

	We respect the voting consumers' [[right to vanish]] by having '''unique but discardable ids'''. Just		We respect the voting consumers' [[right to vanish]] by having '''unique but discardable ids'''. Just

Jukeboksi: moving paragraphs around

2013-01-12T12:36:38Z

moving paragraphs around

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 Consumerium has the opposite system where '''voting''' is '''open''' though '''anonymized''' for consumer comfort and security and vote '''counting''' is up-to-'''personal and [[#The trick is in the counting|closed]]''' which is possible because there is '''no requirement to reach a consensus''' like there is when electing elected representatives of the people in democratic elections or writing an encyclopedia.
 == What one will be able to vote ? ==
@@ Line 36: / Line 25: @@
 ----
 == What things will you be able to vote on ? ==
 Everybody may vote on any thing (it should be somehow related to production, trading or shopping),  or  but only the following will be tallied [[:Category:Companies|Companies]], [[:Category:Brands|Brands]], [[:Category:Products|Products]], [[:Category:Product groups|Product groups]], [[:Category:Countries]] and [[:Cateogry:Areas|Areas]]. If Votes overlap or conflict, the first or last vote encountered will be counted. This is yet to be decided.

Jukeboksi: /* Right to vanish for the voters */

2013-01-12T12:25:12Z

Right to vanish for the voters

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:25, 12 January 2013
Line 12:		Line 12:

	We respect the voting consumers' [[right to vanish]] by having '''unique but discardable ids'''. Just		We respect the voting consumers' [[right to vanish]] by having '''unique but discardable ids'''. Just
	#) Set all vote sub-sets non-visible.		#) Set all vote sub-sets non-visible.
	#) Discard your old voter id. ( some data will be kept, needs to be worked out what )		#) Discard your old voter id. ( some data will be kept, needs to be worked out what )
	#) ~~Take~~ a new ~~one~~.		#) Slightly modify your votes and take a new voter id.
	and '''you are once again the only one that knows who is this new id'''.		and '''you are once again the only one that knows who is this new id'''

	== What one will be able to vote ? ==		== What one will be able to vote ? ==

Jukeboksi: putting some of the stuff from the introduction under their own headings for clarity and to shorten the length of the intro

2012-12-29T09:56:44Z

putting some of the stuff from the introduction under their own headings for clarity and to shorten the length of the intro

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:56, 29 December 2012
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Consumerium has the opposite system where '''voting''' is '''open''' though '''anonymized''' for consumer comfort and security and vote '''counting''' is up-to-'''personal and [[#The trick is in the counting\|closed]]''' which is possible because there is '''no requirement to reach a consensus''' like there is when electing elected representatives of the people in democratic elections or writing an encyclopedia.		Consumerium has the opposite system where '''voting''' is '''open''' though '''anonymized''' for consumer comfort and security and vote '''counting''' is up-to-'''personal and [[#The trick is in the counting\|closed]]''' which is possible because there is '''no requirement to reach a consensus''' like there is when electing elected representatives of the people in democratic elections or writing an encyclopedia.

			== Open but anonymized voting ==
	Everybody will be able to see what everybody voted but not know which votes were cast by whom. This way we can protect the voters privacy while maintaining resilience to information warfare. It would enrich the Consumium social media game experience to be able to share sub-sets of your votes with your friends or even publish some sets of your votes for all to see. Forming teams and factions that draw and aggregate from team/faction members' votes sub-sets seems a likely feature.		Everybody will be able to see what everybody voted but not know which votes were cast by whom. This way we can protect the voters privacy while maintaining resilience to information warfare. It would enrich the Consumium social media game experience to be able to share sub-sets of your votes with your friends or even publish some sets of your votes for all to see. Forming teams and factions that draw and aggregate from team/faction members' votes sub-sets seems a likely feature.

			== Right to vanish for the voters ==
	By default voter ids and wiki-accounts can cannot be connected for reasons of consumer privacy protection.		By default voter ids and wiki-accounts can cannot be connected for reasons of consumer privacy protection.

Jukeboksi: fixing old info in last paragraph

2012-12-29T09:50:49Z

fixing old info in last paragraph

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:50, 29 December 2012
Line 83:		Line 83:

	== When will voting be implemented ? ==		== When will voting be implemented ? ==
	Not from the start of the [[implementation phase]] surely ( one would be able to guess who is who ). A few thousand users sounds adequate time to implement the voting and vote counting system. Running [[w:one-way hash function]] of ~~a voter id~~ and representing that in a [[w:Base 36]] encoding ~~seems~~ to have ~~serious vulnerabilities though it provides some sort of anonymization~~. ~~Does the set of voter's votes need to have permanent id?~~		Not from the start of the [[implementation phase]] surely ( one would be able to guess who is who ). A few thousand users sounds adequate time to implement the voting and vote counting system. Running [[w:one-way hash function]] of the user name and the secret secret for that user and representing that in a [[w:Base 36]] encoding could be one way to have public voter ids.

	[[Category:Help]]		[[Category:Help]]

Jukeboksi: tweaking text

2012-12-17T12:19:59Z

tweaking text

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:19, 17 December 2012
Line 9:		Line 9:
	By default voter ids and wiki-accounts can cannot be connected for reasons of consumer privacy protection.		By default voter ids and wiki-accounts can cannot be connected for reasons of consumer privacy protection.

	We respect the [[right to vanish]] ~~of the voting consumers~~ by having '''unique but discardable ids'''. Just		We respect the voting consumers' [[right to vanish]] by having '''unique but discardable ids'''. Just
	#) Set all vote sub-sets non-visible.		#) Set all vote sub-sets non-visible.
	#) Discard your old voter id. ( some data will be kept, needs to be worked out what )		#) Discard your old voter id. ( some data will be kept, needs to be worked out what )

Jukeboksi: public unique and discardable voter ids + Right to vanish as many times as the voting consumer wants

2012-12-16T20:36:48Z

public unique and discardable voter ids + Right to vanish as many times as the voting consumer wants

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:36, 16 December 2012
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Everybody will be able to see what everybody voted but not know which votes were cast by whom. This way we can protect the voters privacy while maintaining resilience to information warfare. It would enrich the Consumium social media game experience to be able to share sub-sets of your votes with your friends or even publish some sets of your votes for all to see. Forming teams and factions that draw and aggregate from team/faction members' votes sub-sets seems a likely feature.		Everybody will be able to see what everybody voted but not know which votes were cast by whom. This way we can protect the voters privacy while maintaining resilience to information warfare. It would enrich the Consumium social media game experience to be able to share sub-sets of your votes with your friends or even publish some sets of your votes for all to see. Forming teams and factions that draw and aggregate from team/faction members' votes sub-sets seems a likely feature.

			By default voter ids and wiki-accounts can cannot be connected for reasons of consumer privacy protection.

			We respect the [[right to vanish]] of the voting consumers by having '''unique but discardable ids'''. Just
			#) Set all vote sub-sets non-visible.
			#) Discard your old voter id. ( some data will be kept, needs to be worked out what )
			#) Take a new one.
			and '''you are once again the only one that knows who is this new id'''.

	== What one will be able to vote ? ==		== What one will be able to vote ? ==

Jukeboksi: /* The trick is in the counting. */ remove sentence that had onlhy relation to having non-anonymized voting system

2012-10-20T15:09:39Z

The trick is in the counting.: remove sentence that had onlhy relation to having non-anonymized voting system

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:09, 20 October 2012
Line 35:		Line 35:
	The most simple way to achieve a vote counting result that is customized is to use '''automatic amplification''', a one-check-box-solution, which is to say that the people who voted similar to you get more voting power ( say +30% ) ( amplification ) and those who voted conflicting with your votes get less ( dampening ) ( say -30% )		The most simple way to achieve a vote counting result that is customized is to use '''automatic amplification''', a one-check-box-solution, which is to say that the people who voted similar to you get more voting power ( say +30% ) ( amplification ) and those who voted conflicting with your votes get less ( dampening ) ( say -30% )

	With the '''open voting, tuneable counting''' we are making sure that we have the highest resiliency to information warfare . Every time a skewing effort ( usually by paid trolls ) is detected proper counter measures ( parametrization of the vote counting ) can be formulated and distributed~~. The loss in this set-up is exposure to consumption pattern profiling for those who vote ( then again this happens in twitter and facebook too if you talk / like about your consumption habits )~~.		With the '''open voting, tuneable counting''' we are making sure that we have the highest resiliency to information warfare . Every time a skewing effort ( usually by paid trolls ) is detected proper counter measures ( parametrization of the vote counting ) can be formulated and distributed.

	As in all highly-political wikis we expect a [[paid trolls vs. unpaid trolls]] situation. We are also optimist and hope that a healthy dynamic equilibrium(s) will form. :D :D		As in all highly-political wikis we expect a [[paid trolls vs. unpaid trolls]] situation. We are also optimist and hope that a healthy dynamic equilibrium(s) will form. :D :D