User talk:Juxo/Chat Gallery/28.08.2004 with TimStarling - Revision history

142.177.114.38: Refusing the Obvious For Life, Making Australia 'Orrific?

2004-09-02T20:18:09Z

Refusing the Obvious For Life, Making Australia 'Orrific?

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:18, 2 September 2004
Line 16:		Line 16:

	:::::::ROFLMAO -- [[User:Tim Starling\|Tim Starling]] 03:00, 2 Sep 2004 (EEST)		:::::::ROFLMAO -- [[User:Tim Starling\|Tim Starling]] 03:00, 2 Sep 2004 (EEST)

			::::::::assume you mean Refusing the Obvious For Life, Making Australia 'Orrific?

	Ils sont mignons tous les deux ;-) ant (editors translation: They are nice both)		Ils sont mignons tous les deux ;-) ant (editors translation: They are nice both)

2004-09-02T00:00:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:00, 2 September 2004
Line 14:		Line 14:

	::::::Because all of us [[trolls]] are wiser than all of you [[developer]]s, mate.		::::::Because all of us [[trolls]] are wiser than all of you [[developer]]s, mate.

			:::::::ROFLMAO -- [[User:Tim Starling\|Tim Starling]] 03:00, 2 Sep 2004 (EEST)

	Ils sont mignons tous les deux ;-) ant (editors translation: They are nice both)		Ils sont mignons tous les deux ;-) ant (editors translation: They are nice both)

2004-09-01T18:24:57Z

wiser

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:24, 1 September 2004
Line 12:		Line 12:

	:::::You're not going to listen to me but you expect me to listen to you? Why should I do that? -- [[User:Tim Starling\|Tim Starling]] 07:50, 1 Sep 2004 (EEST)		:::::You're not going to listen to me but you expect me to listen to you? Why should I do that? -- [[User:Tim Starling\|Tim Starling]] 07:50, 1 Sep 2004 (EEST)

			::::::Because all of us [[trolls]] are wiser than all of you [[developer]]s, mate.

	Ils sont mignons tous les deux ;-) ant (editors translation: They are nice both)		Ils sont mignons tous les deux ;-) ant (editors translation: They are nice both)

2004-09-01T11:28:39Z

tranlation

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:28, 1 September 2004
Line 13:		Line 13:
	:::::You're not going to listen to me but you expect me to listen to you? Why should I do that? -- [[User:Tim Starling\|Tim Starling]] 07:50, 1 Sep 2004 (EEST)		:::::You're not going to listen to me but you expect me to listen to you? Why should I do that? -- [[User:Tim Starling\|Tim Starling]] 07:50, 1 Sep 2004 (EEST)

	Ils sont mignons tous les deux ;-) ant		Ils sont mignons tous les deux ;-) ant (editors translation: They are nice both)

2004-09-01T04:57:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:57, 1 September 2004
Line 12:		Line 12:

	:::::You're not going to listen to me but you expect me to listen to you? Why should I do that? -- [[User:Tim Starling\|Tim Starling]] 07:50, 1 Sep 2004 (EEST)		:::::You're not going to listen to me but you expect me to listen to you? Why should I do that? -- [[User:Tim Starling\|Tim Starling]] 07:50, 1 Sep 2004 (EEST)

			Ils sont mignons tous les deux ;-) ant

2004-09-01T04:55:28Z

whoa

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:55, 1 September 2004
Line 11:		Line 11:
	::::Besides [[trolls]] do not listen to [[developer vigilantiism\|developer vigilantes]] of no particular talent. Though they will answer [[Lowest Troll]]s they respect, usually. The latest bout of hack-backs on essential articles is a sign however that [[Wikimedia corruption]] may be spreading to this wiki.		::::Besides [[trolls]] do not listen to [[developer vigilantiism\|developer vigilantes]] of no particular talent. Though they will answer [[Lowest Troll]]s they respect, usually. The latest bout of hack-backs on essential articles is a sign however that [[Wikimedia corruption]] may be spreading to this wiki.

	:::::You're not going to listen to me but you expect me to listen to you? Why should I do that? ~~I guess I should be awed by the intellectual presence of a man capable of inventing new meanings for a word like "ontology".~~ -- [[User:Tim Starling\|Tim Starling]] 07:50, 1 Sep 2004 (EEST)		:::::You're not going to listen to me but you expect me to listen to you? Why should I do that? -- [[User:Tim Starling\|Tim Starling]] 07:50, 1 Sep 2004 (EEST)

2004-09-01T04:50:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:50, 1 September 2004
Line 10:		Line 10:

	::::Besides [[trolls]] do not listen to [[developer vigilantiism\|developer vigilantes]] of no particular talent. Though they will answer [[Lowest Troll]]s they respect, usually. The latest bout of hack-backs on essential articles is a sign however that [[Wikimedia corruption]] may be spreading to this wiki.		::::Besides [[trolls]] do not listen to [[developer vigilantiism\|developer vigilantes]] of no particular talent. Though they will answer [[Lowest Troll]]s they respect, usually. The latest bout of hack-backs on essential articles is a sign however that [[Wikimedia corruption]] may be spreading to this wiki.

			:::::You're not going to listen to me but you expect me to listen to you? Why should I do that? I guess I should be awed by the intellectual presence of a man capable of inventing new meanings for a word like "ontology". -- [[User:Tim Starling\|Tim Starling]] 07:50, 1 Sep 2004 (EEST)

2004-08-31T22:38:44Z

more exact: the user interface designer is the one who picks the names, not the coder

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:38, 31 August 2004
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:::Seconds! --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 10:46, 31 Aug 2004 (EEST)		:::Seconds! --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 10:46, 31 Aug 2004 (EEST)

	::::Coders do not make [[ontology]] choices in any reasonable project. There is no chance that this can lead to anything but disaster. Which anyone who has done any [[data warehouse]] work knows from firsthand pain.		::::Coders do not make [[ontology]] choices in any reasonable project. There is no chance that this can lead to anything but disaster. Which anyone who has done any [[data warehouse]] work knows from firsthand pain. It's the [[user interface designer]]s that actually make the choices about what things are called, in a reasonable project, and the [[management accounting]] categories, e.g. [[styles of capital]], that determine the deeper categorization systems.

	::::Besides [[trolls]] do not listen to [[developer vigilantiism\|developer vigilantes]] of no particular talent.		::::Besides [[trolls]] do not listen to [[developer vigilantiism\|developer vigilantes]] of no particular talent. Though they will answer [[Lowest Troll]]s they respect, usually. The latest bout of hack-backs on essential articles is a sign however that [[Wikimedia corruption]] may be spreading to this wiki.

2004-08-31T22:06:37Z

coders don't make ontology choices, trolls don't listen to developer vigilantes

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:06, 31 August 2004
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:::Seconds! --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 10:46, 31 Aug 2004 (EEST)		:::Seconds! --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 10:46, 31 Aug 2004 (EEST)

			::::Coders do not make [[ontology]] choices in any reasonable project. There is no chance that this can lead to anything but disaster. Which anyone who has done any [[data warehouse]] work knows from firsthand pain.

			::::Besides [[trolls]] do not listen to [[developer vigilantiism\|developer vigilantes]] of no particular talent.

2004-08-31T07:46:43Z

I agree with Tim

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:46, 31 August 2004
Line 4:		Line 4:

	::You can name something as soon as you get off your fat arse and code something. Until then, quit your whinging. -- [[User:Tim Starling\|Tim Starling]] 10:45, 31 Aug 2004 (EEST)		::You can name something as soon as you get off your fat arse and code something. Until then, quit your whinging. -- [[User:Tim Starling\|Tim Starling]] 10:45, 31 Aug 2004 (EEST)

			:::Seconds! --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 10:46, 31 Aug 2004 (EEST)