User:Jukeboksi/Blog/July2012 - Revision history

Jukeboksi: Jukeboksi moved page User:Juboxi/Blog/July2012 to User:Jukeboksi/Blog/July2012: Automatically moved page while renaming the user "Juboxi" to "Jukeboksi"

2017-07-06T15:23:17Z

Jukeboksi moved page User:Juboxi/Blog/July2012 to User:Jukeboksi/Blog/July2012: Automatically moved page while renaming the user "Juboxi" to "Jukeboksi"

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:23, 6 July 2017
(No difference)

Jukeboksi: Juboxi moved page User:Juxo/Blog/July2012 to User:Juboxi/Blog/July2012: Automatically moved page while renaming the user "Juxo" to "Juboxi"

2013-06-14T13:03:58Z

Juboxi moved page User:Juxo/Blog/July2012 to User:Juboxi/Blog/July2012: Automatically moved page while renaming the user "Juxo" to "Juboxi"

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:03, 14 June 2013
(No difference)

Jukeboksi: Backed everything up and upgraded MediaWiki to 1.19.1.

2012-07-17T13:45:20Z

Backed everything up and upgraded MediaWiki to 1.19.1.

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:45, 17 July 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
			== 2012-07-17 ==
			Backed everything up and upgraded [[MediaWiki]] to 1.19.1.

	== 2012-07-12 ==		== 2012-07-12 ==
	Could consider optional anonymization of voting for consumer information safety but that will hasten the skewing effort by [[paid trolls]] like voting positive on Nestlé, Shell and so and if the votes are anonymized we can't go and tell them that we have a problem with someone voting something they vote since we cannot no longer know who is it that is voting stuff that has to be cleared out with tuning the counting distributed the tuned counting system to anti-skew.		Could consider optional anonymization of voting for consumer information safety but that will hasten the skewing effort by [[paid trolls]] like voting positive on Nestlé, Shell and so and if the votes are anonymized we can't go and tell them that we have a problem with someone voting something they vote since we cannot no longer know who is it that is voting stuff that has to be cleared out with tuning the counting distributed the tuned counting system to anti-skew.

Jukeboksi: Could consider optional anonymization of voting for consumer information safety but that will hasten the skewing effort by paid trolls...

2012-07-12T13:46:34Z

Could consider optional anonymization of voting for consumer information safety but that will hasten the skewing effort by paid trolls...

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:46, 12 July 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
			== 2012-07-12 ==
			Could consider optional anonymization of voting for consumer information safety but that will hasten the skewing effort by [[paid trolls]] like voting positive on Nestlé, Shell and so and if the votes are anonymized we can't go and tell them that we have a problem with someone voting something they vote since we cannot no longer know who is it that is voting stuff that has to be cleared out with tuning the counting distributed the tuned counting system to anti-skew.

			.

	== 2012-07-02 ==		== 2012-07-02 ==
	http://dumps.consumium.org now online, the 2nd server. I chose the Finnish hosting guys because:		http://dumps.consumium.org now online, the 2nd server. I chose the Finnish hosting guys because:

Jukeboksi: Translatewiki is a great resource for Consumium effort./* 2012-07-02 */

2012-07-03T12:25:11Z

Translatewiki is a great resource for Consumium effort.2012-07-02

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:25, 3 July 2012
Line 6:		Line 6:
	In their solution we can have all VPS bought from them in the same subnet and then via the API ( or the web interface to the API ) you can configure the L3 [[firewall]] that controls traffic in or out of any machine in the subnet so that should yield a high performance system with only a few handfuls of virtual servers. Physically their computers are connected to each other over 10Gb/s Ethernet and their storage solution is fast SAS-disks connected to an extremely low latency 40Gbit/s [[w:infiniband]] network and [[w:SSD]] read caching in the middle of the disks and the superfast network.		In their solution we can have all VPS bought from them in the same subnet and then via the API ( or the web interface to the API ) you can configure the L3 [[firewall]] that controls traffic in or out of any machine in the subnet so that should yield a high performance system with only a few handfuls of virtual servers. Physically their computers are connected to each other over 10Gb/s Ethernet and their storage solution is fast SAS-disks connected to an extremely low latency 40Gbit/s [[w:infiniband]] network and [[w:SSD]] read caching in the middle of the disks and the superfast network.

	Yeah.. Loaded 45€+VAT to the upcloud.com account estimate says that the total money in the account is enough for 104 days of [[2nd server]]		Yeah.. Loaded 45€+VAT to the upcloud.com account estimate says that the total money in the account is enough for 104 days of [[2nd server]] as of 2012-07-02

			[[Translatewiki]] is a great resource for Consumium effort.

	== 2012-07-01 ==		== 2012-07-01 ==

Jukeboksi: Yeah.. Loaded 45€+VAT to the upcloud.com account estimate says that the total money in the account is enough for 104 days

2012-07-02T21:03:04Z

Yeah.. Loaded 45€+VAT to the upcloud.com account estimate says that the total money in the account is enough for 104 days

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:03, 2 July 2012
Line 5:		Line 5:

	In their solution we can have all VPS bought from them in the same subnet and then via the API ( or the web interface to the API ) you can configure the L3 [[firewall]] that controls traffic in or out of any machine in the subnet so that should yield a high performance system with only a few handfuls of virtual servers. Physically their computers are connected to each other over 10Gb/s Ethernet and their storage solution is fast SAS-disks connected to an extremely low latency 40Gbit/s [[w:infiniband]] network and [[w:SSD]] read caching in the middle of the disks and the superfast network.		In their solution we can have all VPS bought from them in the same subnet and then via the API ( or the web interface to the API ) you can configure the L3 [[firewall]] that controls traffic in or out of any machine in the subnet so that should yield a high performance system with only a few handfuls of virtual servers. Physically their computers are connected to each other over 10Gb/s Ethernet and their storage solution is fast SAS-disks connected to an extremely low latency 40Gbit/s [[w:infiniband]] network and [[w:SSD]] read caching in the middle of the disks and the superfast network.

			Yeah.. Loaded 45€+VAT to the upcloud.com account estimate says that the total money in the account is enough for 104 days of [[2nd server]]

	== 2012-07-01 ==		== 2012-07-01 ==

Jukeboksi: http://dumps.consumium.org now online, the 2nd server...

2012-07-02T20:13:37Z

http://dumps.consumium.org now online, the 2nd server...

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:13, 2 July 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
			== 2012-07-02 ==
			http://dumps.consumium.org now online, the 2nd server. I chose the Finnish hosting guys because:
			#) of the inevitable demand for backup space and with as low as 100 or 200GB the cost-savings were substantial
			#) I am foreseeing a future rise in server performance demand as we begin with the implementation phase.

			In their solution we can have all VPS bought from them in the same subnet and then via the API ( or the web interface to the API ) you can configure the L3 [[firewall]] that controls traffic in or out of any machine in the subnet so that should yield a high performance system with only a few handfuls of virtual servers. Physically their computers are connected to each other over 10Gb/s Ethernet and their storage solution is fast SAS-disks connected to an extremely low latency 40Gbit/s [[w:infiniband]] network and [[w:SSD]] read caching in the middle of the disks and the superfast network.

	== 2012-07-01 ==		== 2012-07-01 ==
	Looking at two potential VPS-from-cloud providers, http://www.gandi.net and http://fi.upcloud.com . I use the former for domain registry and really like it. Seems like an extremely solid and sympathic company otoh the latter gets cheaper and cheaper in comparison when the requirement for diskspace goes up. The fi.upcloud.com uses fast SAS disks attached to 40Gbit/s infiniband networking ( 4 x the speed of 10Gbit ethernet and lower latency ) .		Looking at two potential VPS-from-cloud providers, http://www.gandi.net and http://fi.upcloud.com . I use the former for domain registry and really like it. Seems like an extremely solid and sympathic company otoh the latter gets cheaper and cheaper in comparison when the requirement for diskspace goes up. The fi.upcloud.com uses fast SAS disks attached to 40Gbit/s infiniband networking ( 4 x the speed of 10Gbit ethernet and lower latency ) .

Jukeboksi: some more on the two vps-from-cloud providers I'm considering for the server no. 2

2012-07-01T20:33:44Z

some more on the two vps-from-cloud providers I'm considering for the server no. 2

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:33, 1 July 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== 2012-07-01 ==		== 2012-07-01 ==
	Looking at two potential VPS-from-cloud providers, http://www.gandi.net and http://fi.upcloud.com . I use the former for domain registry and really like it. Seems like an extremely solid and sympathic company otoh the latter gets cheaper and cheaper in comparison when the requirement for diskspace goes up.		Looking at two potential VPS-from-cloud providers, http://www.gandi.net and http://fi.upcloud.com . I use the former for domain registry and really like it. Seems like an extremely solid and sympathic company otoh the latter gets cheaper and cheaper in comparison when the requirement for diskspace goes up. The fi.upcloud.com uses fast SAS disks attached to 40Gbit/s infiniband networking ( 4 x the speed of 10Gbit ethernet and lower latency ) .

	The server no. 2 I'm shopping for now will be called backup.consumium.org and besides backing other servers up only serves as status.consumium.org and dumps.consumium.org. Without root password, strictly only very trusted people have sudo access, using ssh keys instead of passwords to access the backuppable servers / services.		The server no. 2 I'm shopping for now will be called backup.consumium.org and besides backing other servers up only serves as status.consumium.org and dumps.consumium.org. Without root password, strictly only very trusted people have sudo access, using ssh keys instead of passwords to access the backuppable servers / services.

			Then server no. 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 etc can be backupped automized to the backup server.

Jukeboksi: about current going ons

2012-07-01T20:26:26Z

about current going ons

New page

== 2012-07-01 ==
Looking at two potential VPS-from-cloud providers, http://www.gandi.net and http://fi.upcloud.com . I use the former for domain registry and really like it. Seems like an extremely solid and sympathic company otoh the latter gets cheaper and cheaper in comparison when the requirement for diskspace goes up.

The server no. 2 I'm shopping for now will be called backup.consumium.org and besides backing other servers up only serves as status.consumium.org and dumps.consumium.org. Without root password, strictly only very trusted people have sudo access, using ssh keys instead of passwords to access the backuppable servers / services.